A magnitude 5 earthquake that hit Cushing, Oklahoma, on Sunday night is the latest and, in some ways, the most troubling in a series of temblors that has rocked the Sooner State over the past few years. Not only did it strike close to what is arguably one of the US’ most important strategic assets — Cushing is the largest crude oil trading hub in North America, with about 600 million barrels of stored crude — but its occurrence raises questions over the state’s ability to do anything about the significant rise in seismic activity, which has been linked to oil and gas activity.
While regulations limiting the underground disposal of wastewater have succeeded in reducing the overall frequency of earthquakes, they have not been able to stop the really big ones from happening. With a recent flurry of quakes hitting closer to Cushing, that is raising questions about national security risks.
Last year, Oklahoma experienced more than 1,000 earthquakes measuring at least magnitude 3; that is up from fewer than two in 2008. The state is now the most seismically active in the continental US. Seismologists believe the quakes there are the result of wastewater injection wells used by the oil and gas industry.
Illustration: Lance Liu
Horizontal oil wells in Oklahoma can produce as many as nine or 10 barrels of salty, toxin-laced water for every barrel of oil, and much of that fluid is injected back underground into wastewater disposal wells. The fracking revolution resulted in an enormous increase in the disposal of wastewater underground in Oklahoma. From 2009 to 2014, disposal volumes shot up 81 percent, to more than 1 billion barrels per year. It is this wastewater, injected near faults, that many seismologists, including those at the US Geological Survey, say has caused the spike in earthquakes.
After years of official skepticism over the relationship between fracking and earthquakes, Oklahoma’s government last year finally acknowledged the link. That came as the industry was reeling from lower crude prices, and it was a big step, considering that oil and gas accounts for about a quarter of all jobs in the state. That summer, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC), the state’s oil and gas regulator, began imposing restrictions aimed at cutting the amount of wastewater disposed of underground. To date, the OCC has ordered about 700 disposal wells either to shut down or reduce their volumes. That has cut disposal rates by about 800,000 barrels per day, from a high of about 2.5 million in 2014.
With the added restrictions, Oklahoma has gone from averaging more than four earthquakes per day to about two per day. The reduction, in some ways, confirms the connection between wastewater disposal and earthquakes.
“It’s the closest thing we have to a smoking gun,” Oklahoma Geological Survey director Jeremy Boak said.
However, it also shows the limited power of strict regulations in reducing the largest earthquakes.
The Cushing quake was the third quake with a magnitude of 5 or greater so far this year in Central Oklahoma, the 19th temblor over the past week. It hit just two months after the biggest quake in state history, a magnitude 5.8 one in Pawnee, about 40km south of Cushing.
That event has muted some of the enthusiasm around the OCC restrictions, said Dan McNamara, a research geophysicist at the US Geological Survey in Denver.
“For about six months, the story was that these restrictions were working, but then the 5.8 hit,” McNamara said. “The small events may be trending down, but the frequency of the largest ones is going up, and that is what’s troubling about this latest cluster of activity, particularly around Cushing.”
Last year, McNamara coauthored a paper that studied a sequence of earthquakes around Cushing in 2014. His paper linked the quakes to the activity of four injection wells in the vicinity. It also uncovered a fault line directly beneath Cushing’s enormous oil tanks that was previously unknown to geologists — the same fault that was activated on Sunday.
The recent seismic activity, despite a significant reduction in disposal rates, is cause for concern, McNamara said.
“It tells me that there is something else going on other than the direct injection of water underground,” he said.
Even if Oklahoma were to stop injecting wastewater tomorrow, the chance of large quakes would remain elevated for years to come, McNamara said.
The pressure that fracking wastewater has added to the complex network of fault lines running beneath Oklahoma is not going away.
“We’re looking at many, many years of earthquakes as that energy dissipates through the system,” he said.
The Cushing quake knocked out power and damaged many of the small town’s historic buildings, but no damage was reported to its oil and gas infrastructure. The oil facility resumed normal operations on Monday.
Even so, might the latest tremblers serve as a wake-up call to the industry that more must be done to prevent what could ultimately become a national catastrophe?
“I don’t think this changes anything,” said Kim Hatfield, vice chairman of the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association, a trade group of oil and gas producers.
The industry still strongly opposes any moratorium on wastewater disposal, she said.
Although big fracking companies are exploring options on how to treat and recycle their wastewater, rather than inject it underground, the industry insists those options still are not cost-effective and that a disposal moratorium would destroy the state’s economy by shutting down oil production.
“If you shut down wastewater disposal, there won’t be anything left to regulate,” Hatfield said.
“So that is an awfully expensive science project you’d have there.”
It is also an awfully risky chance to take.
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so