As Taiwan’s economy continues to suffer from sluggish market conditions and a low growth rate, central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) on Sept. 29 proposed seven stimulus measures, including plans to boost exports by enhancing regional economic integration and six measures aimed at raising domestic demand. Of these, expanding public investment is one expansionary fiscal policy that the government could adopt without any further delay. President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration should seriously consider increasing public investment as a way to lead the nation toward economic recovery.
However, judging from the government’s budget for next year, which is currently under review at the Legislative Yuan, Premier Lin Chuan (林全) and his Cabinet seem to have no plan or ambition to do so. A look at the central government’s budget plan shows that it is only to be expanded by 1.1 percent, even less than the expected GDP growth rate of 1.9 percent.
The government’s annual expenditure-to-GDP ratio is only 11.55 percent, which, after further cuts by the legislature and budget execution, is expected to be the lowest since the 1974 oil crisis. The average expenditure-to-GDP ratio was 15.09 percent under former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) administration, 13.37 percent under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and 12.07 percent under former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), yet the first annual budget of Lin’s financially savvy Cabinet is even lower than that of the conservative Ma administration.
How will the government convince the public that it will be able to save the economy? Having been elected with a huge majority, should the Tsai administration not be more ambitious?
Perhaps the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) has no choice but to propose this budget, as tax revenue makes up only about 12 percent of GDP, and as it is unable to issue debt due to restrictions in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法). This ratio was higher during Lee’s presidency, allowing the government greater expenditure while still being able to live within its means.
While this view seems to make sense, it is a specious argument. When interest rates are lower, it is difficult to use monetary policy to stimulate the economy, thus necessitating expansive fiscal policies. The efficacy of such policies are easy to see if we take a look at the 2008 global financial crisis, when country after country issued debt to expand public expenditure.
Taiwan’s economy is sluggish right now, the central bank has announced that it would be difficult to lower interest rates further and the international economic situation is unclear. Public investment is the only way to start up the economy.
In the wake of the latest typhoon, the number of households without electricity reached a new high, while many bridges, roads and other infrastructure were destroyed. This puts the spotlight on deteriorating basic infrastructure, and the government must decide whether to improve it or rebuild it. The government has allocated only NT$186.9 billion (US$5.94 billion) of next year’s budget to infrastructure construction, 9.3 percent of the total annual budget expenditure, which clearly falls short of what is needed.
The budget is being reviewed by the legislature, and according to the Constitution, legislators can make budget cuts, but are not allowed to make additions. The Lin Cabinet could therefore consider using a special budget to increase infrastructure spending. In addition to stimulating the economy, it would also provide the general public with a more secure living situation.
Hsu Jen-hui is a professor at Shih Hsin University’s Department of Public Policy and Management.
Translated by Tu Yu-an and Perry Svensson
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose