Campaigners claim millions of shoppers are being led to believe the expensive shoes they buy in high-street stores are made in Germany and Italy — when many are actually made by workers on poverty wages in eastern European sweatshops.
The scandal is exposed in a damning investigation into the European shoe industry, which details illegal wages and shocking working conditions in factories turning out footwear for the UK market.
The investigation claims some big brands appear to be using a legal loophole, stamping their products “Made in Italy” or “Made in Germany” to suggest they are high quality, when they have actually been made by poverty-stricken eastern European workers.
Illustration: Mountain People
The investigation found that footwear workers in Albania were earning as little as ￡0.49 (US$0.65) per hour including overtime — which is an illegal rate even in such a poor country.
Workers in Macedonia, where the hourly wage was as low as ￡0.64, described being taken to hospital in wheelbarrows after fainting in freezing factories where they had to work with strong chemicals.
“If the employer needs to complete, let’s say, an order of 9,000 pairs of shoes, he will put 90 pairs on the belt and even if you want to die, you have to finish it,” a worker told researchers compiling the report, entitled Labour on a Shoestring.
It alleges that one Macedonian factory, which produced Geox shoes, was paying illegally low wages of 131 euros (US$148) a month, with overtime. The legal minimum is 145 euros before overtime.
Geox shoes are available in the UK through John Lewis and House of Fraser, among other retailers. Geox did not respond to requests for comment.
Manufacturers are able to take advantage of an obscure European loophole known as the outward processing trade scheme. Under the rules, companies cut parts for the shoes in one country before exporting them to a low-wage economy where they are assembled and sewn. They are then imported back to the original country, duty free. The finished shoes can then be labeled as being made in the original country.
The report, compiled by researchers from several European rights groups, is based on interviews with 179 workers in 12 factories. It condemns the program as “a dead-end scheme for workers, national economies and businesses” and describes it as “an economic and social road to ruin.”
Researchers found that the factories produced shoes for brands including Zara, Lowa, Deichmann, Ara, Geox, Bata and Leder & Schuh AG and subsidiaries of CCC Shoes & Bags in Poland and Rieker and Gabor in Slovakia.
Bata did not address the allegations directly, but welcomed the report, which it said had provided “interesting insights in the generally under-reported working conditions in eastern Europe.”
The firm said it expected its suppliers to comply with local laws.
The report looked at production in six low-wage European countries: Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. One in three of the Albanian workers questioned were paid less than the legal minimum wage of ￡121 a month, even with overtime and bonuses.
The report indicated that women were generally worse off.
Albanian workers reported having to work on up to 60 pairs of shoes per day.
About 24 billion pairs of shoes are produced worldwide every year, including about 729 million made in Europe, but prices for European shoes are higher: an average Italian pair exports for ￡39, while an average Chinese pair exports for ￡3.
In a Macedonian factory supplying the Geox, Deichmann and Bata brands, workers said they were expected to use strong chemicals and complained of rheumatism, back pain, allergies and respiratory problems. They said their skin was often exposed to harmful chemicals because wearing gloves meant lower productivity and even lower wages.
Deichmann said it was not aware of issues with the factory, but was conducting its own investigation and would take any action necessary.
According to the report, many workers complained of sweltering conditions in summer and freezing factories in winter.
“My hands are freezing, I’m shivering all over and the door to the hall is open all the time,” one worker said.
“If I get sick at work and if I have a car, somebody will take me to the hospital. But if I don’t have a car, then I will be taken in a wheelbarrow,” another said.
“In the summer, the heat is unbearable so we have had the ambulance here six times this year because coworkers had heat stroke,” one Slovak worker said.
One Romanian worker said that when three women were overcome by the heat at their factory her Italian supervisor joked that “he would have to improvise a cemetery in the back yard if the women continued to faint.”
Anna McMullen, from Labour Behind the Label, a UK-based workers’ rights group involved in the report, said consumers needed to be told the truth about where their shoes come from.
“The clever ruse of shipping shoe parts out to low-wage countries to the east of Europe for assembly and gluing, before returning shoes for labeling as ‘made in Europe’ is duping consumers into thinking their products are made with dignity,” she said.
“In fact, we now know that workers in Albania and Macedonia are being paid wages so low that they cannot feed their families — so much so that the gap between the minimum and living wage is greater than in China,” she said.
McMullen said consumers tended to associate sweatshops with Asia, but the reality is that they exist much closer to home.
“The need for ‘fast fashion’ is bringing shoe production closer to home, and with it comes wage competition with Asia that mirrors, if not tops, the exploitation that we see elsewhere in global supply chains,” she said.
The groups behind the report want manufacturers to be more transparent about where they make shoes that are on sale on UK high streets — and about wages and working conditions.
“Today, we are calling out brands that hide exploitation behind labels that con consumers. Brands have a duty to make sure human rights are delivered for people who make their shoes. Being honest about where that is, is one of the first steps,” McMullen said.
Separately, one company not named in the report, Adidas, was invited by the researchers to comment on its findings and backed the campaigners’ calls for improved working conditions.
“We do agree ... that working conditions in eastern Europe are generally under-reported and increased worker rights protection is called for. More should be done to improve wages,” it said.
Zara’s parent company, Inditex, confirmed that it produced a small number of shoes in Romania and Albania. It said it operated a strict code of conduct to comply with the most stringent labor and human rights standards.
“In line with a key recommendation of the report, Inditex is working hard, worldwide, to drive living wages throughout its supply chain,” it added.
Lowa said that it too set the highest ethical standards.
“Lowa strongly condemns the deplorable conditions shown in these reports. The decision to manufacture 100 percent ‘made in Europe’ incorporates our assurance of fair and humane manufacturing conditions. We will be intensifying our oversights in this area,” it said in a statement.
The other brands did not respond to the allegations in the report or to the Observer’s request for comment.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on
RSS