China’s economy has slowed in recent years, but it is still going strong and is responsible for about one-third of total economic growth worldwide. It is also becoming more sustainable, in line with the shift in its growth model away from investment and exports and toward domestic demand and services.
In the run-up to next month’s G20 summit in Hangzhou, Beijing has been calling loudly for new commitments to structural reforms to stimulate growth in advanced and emerging market economies. However, China faces serious risks at home. Above all, domestic credit continues to expand at an unsustainable pace, with corporate debt accumulating to dangerous levels.
According to the IMF’s annual report on the Chinese economy, credit is growing about twice as fast as output. It is rising rapidly in both the nonfinancial private sector and in an expanding, interconnected financial sector that remains opaque. In addition, while credit growth is high by international standards — a key indicator of a potential crisis — its ability to spur further growth is diminishing.
Warning signs are flashing and the Chinese government has acknowledged the overall problem. However, to avoid a crisis, it should immediately implement comprehensive reforms to address the root causes of the corporate debt problem. These include soft budget constraints for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and local governments, implicit and explicit government guarantees of debt; and prevention measures against excessive risk taking in the financial sector.
To tackle the problem, Beijing must, in the words of Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), “ruthlessly bring down the knife [on] zombie enterprises.”
This culling should be combined with concrete measures to restructure salvageable firms; recognize and allocate creditor losses; account for displaced workers and other social costs: and further open private-sector markets.
It is especially important to restructure SOEs. Many are essentially on life support, contributing only one-fifth of total industrial output but accounting for about half of, all corporate debt. A serious restructuring effort — including stricter budget constraints and an end to lending to nonviable firms and government guarantees on debt, along with other supply-side reforms already underway — would create space for more dynamic companies to emerge and contribute to growth.
China is unique in many respects, but it is not the first country to experience corporate debt difficulties. Its leaders should heed three broad lessons from other countries’ experience.
First, authorities should act quickly and effectively, lest today’s corporate-debt problem become tomorrow’s systemic debt problem.
Second, they should deal with both creditors and debtors — some countries’ solutions address only one or the other, sowing the seeds for future problems.
Finally, the governance structures that permitted the problem to arise must be identified and reformed.
At a minimum, China needs an effective system to deal with insolvency; strict regulation of risk pricing and assessment; and robust accounting, loan-loss provisioning and financial disclosure rules.
Influential voices in China are quick to draw the lesson from international experience that tackling corporate debt can limit short-term growth and impose social costs, such as unemployment. These are valid concerns, but the alternatives — half measures or no reform at all — would only make a bad situation worse.
China should begin by restructuring unviable companies in its fastest-growing regions, where workers would find new jobs more quickly and reforms are not likely to hurt growth. Policymakers can then be more selective when it comes to restructuring in slower-growing regions and cities where a single company dominates the local economy.
In addition, structural unemployment and worker resettlement costs can be mitigated with a strong social safety net that includes funds for targeted labor redeployment so that workers can get back on their feet. This approach would show the government’s commitment to those at risk of displacement.
To its credit, China has already made some efforts to solve its debt problem and begin deleveraging. The current Five-Year Plan aims to reduce excess capacity in the coal and steel sectors, identify and restructure nonviable “zombie” SOEs, and fund programs to support affected workers.
Now is the time for China to push for far-reaching reforms. Banks’ balance sheets still have a relatively low volume of nonperforming loans — and high provisioning. The costs of potential losses on corporate loans — estimated at 7 percent of GDP in the IMF’s latest Global Financial Stability Report — are manageable. Furthermore, the government maintains high buffers: debt is relatively low and foreign-exchange reserves are relatively high.
The question is whether China will manage to deleverage enough before these buffers are exhausted. Given its record of economic success and the government’s strong commitment to an ambitious reform agenda, China can rise to the challenge. However, it must start now.
David Lipton, first deputy managing director at the IMF, was senior director of the US National Economic Council and National Security Council during US President Barack Obama’s first administration.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot
RSS