The Ministry of Economic Affairs has held three public hearings on amendments to the Electricity Act (電業法). The Cabinet aims to submit a draft to the legislature for review before the legislative session begins next month.
Under the proposal, the electricity sector would undergo a major transition from a state-run system to a market-driven pricing scheme. The government is making an effort to break the nation’s electricity monopoly and welcome private participants to the market.
Looking at electricity reform worldwide, a sound institutional design is critical to ensuring a transition to a low-carbon electricity supply while maintaining reasonable electricity prices and adequate energy security. Over the past two decades, the world’s largest developing countries, such as Brazil, India, Mexico, Argentina and China, have also initiated power sector reforms and articulated reform strategies referencing some advanced jurisdictions, such as California, England and the EU.
From the beginning of its reform process, the EU decided to move toward a low-carbon electricity supply, with an emphasis on increasing the contribution of renewable energy sources, the introduction of a cap on carbon emissions and the establishment of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.
From this, the key components of a successful low-carbon electricity supply transition can be distilled. First, privatization of state-run electricity monopolies; second, vertical separation of potentially competitive elements, such as generation, marketing and retail supply; third, horizontal integration of transmission facilities and network operations; fourth, competitive procurement processes for low-carbon generation, with reasonable exposure to wholesale price variability; fifth, appropriate pricing of environmental externalities; sixth, development of demand participation in wholesale market prices; seventh, cost reflective access terms for renewables; and eighth, well-established transition mechanisms.
While the experiences in implementing reform vary by jurisdiction within the EU, overall progress has been remarkable. The EU model demonstrates that energy and environmental policies can be inextricably linked.
According to Taiwan’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC), the nation accounted for approximately 0.55 percent of total global greenhouse gas emissions in 2012 and about 0.8 percent of total global carbon emissions. The report also said that the energy and manufacturing industries make up the highest proportion (about 43.25 percent) of Taiwan’s total greenhouse gas emissions.
However, the current draft mainly focuses on legal separation of electricity markets and the restructuring of state-run Taiwan Power Co. It has not clearly integrated this liberalizing process with the national emission reduction target, utility rate design and other important social and technological issues, such as adequate supply of low-cost electricity to poorer households and long-term investment in energy innovation.
Article 3 of the Basic Environment Act (環境基本法) and Article 5 of Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act (溫室氣體減量及管理法 ) state that the government’s energy policies place balanced emphasis on environmental protection, economic development and social justice.
Under this integrated approach, the draft might explicitly include low-carbon targets or environmental considerations and enhance the institutional connections with the INDC, Renewable Energy Development Act (再生能源發展條例) and Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate researching international environmental law at the University of Cambridge and is a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose