Nearly half a century separates the Protect the Diaoyutai Islands Movement and the present movement to assert the nation’s sovereignty over Itu Aba Island, (Taiping Island, 太平島). There is a clear divergence between the origins of each of these movements, their truthfulness and the extent to which they enjoy public support, which demonstrates an increased maturity of judgement among the public.
When the dispute over the Diaoyutais (釣魚台) — known as the Senkakus in Japan — originally arose, the islands were not under Taiwan’s control, nor were they under Chinese control. Nevertheless, the islands’ sovereignty was contested by both countries. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), accusing China of instigating leftist disturbances overseas, tried to use nationalism to create a united front among Taiwanese students both at home and abroad. However, this created problems for the KMT, both internationally and domestically.
The Republic of China (ROC) — which has never controlled the Diaoyutais — did not object when the islands were handed over to US trusteeship at the end of World War II. It was only when the islands were about to be returned to Japan, and following leftist demonstrations, that the ROC began to protest.
The China Youth Corps took control of limited domestic demonstrations, while members of the Overseas Affairs Bureau contended with Chinese Communist Party factions abroad. Officials negotiated with the US and asked for a low-key response to avoid creating a large disturbance.
The main difference between the Diaoyutai and Itu Aba movements is between authoritarianism and control of information on the one hand, and democracy and transparency on the other.
The student supporters of the Protect the Diaoyutai Movement were not in full possession of the facts, having been whipped into a frenzy by ROC officials. At rallies, the students shouted for the islands’ sovereignty to be upheld, but they had no means of setting foot on them, legislators did not dare to grandstand over the issue and even the angry young people did not dare to call on Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) to visit the islands and declare sovereignty.
There are no hot-headed young people taking part in today’s Itu Aba protection movement, just a collection of politicians whose delirious ravings are putting them at risk of high blood pressure. In particular, it is the KMT politicians who lost power in January’s presidential and legislative elections — and who are now being stripped of their ill-gotten assets — who are clamoring the loudest.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague’s verdict on the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines did not touch on the issue of Itu Aba’s sovereignty and Taiwanese students have not been duped by their government this time. All the KMT politicians can do is create a hullabaloo among themselves.
The KMT’s performance has failed to draw a large audience. The party is trying to persuade President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Minister of National Defense Feng Shih-kuan (馮世寬) to play along with their childish game by demanding that they take part in a wholly unnecessary visit to Itu Aba to publicly declare sovereignty over it. Their goal is to divert the government’s attention and change the political narrative into a united front in support of China’s nationalist, anti-US stance.
The era when the KMT was able to control the flow of information and distract the public with red herrings is well and truly over. The KMT’s trickery over Itu Aba is doomed to failure, and it will do nothing to protect the party’s ill-gotten assets or alter the younger generation’s patriotism and identification with Taiwan.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
Imagine that you are fully conscious, but your family, friends and healthcare workers all believe you are vegetative. You hear people discussing euthanasia, cessation of medical treatment, or moving you to a long-term care facility, none of which are able to monitor for signs of recovery. Illness is intrinsically terrifying, but nothing terrifies more than to be fully aware while those you love and those who decide your medical fate regard you as nothing more than an insentient collection of water, calcium and organic molecules. Fifteen years ago, it was discovered that more than 40 percent of patients diagnosed as