The Christian organization Open Doors has reported that Christians at asylum centers in Germany — the European country that has accepted the most refugees and migrants — face “fear and panic,” owing to widespread harassment by other asylum seekers.
Gay refugees are offered shelter at special homes in Germany, for their own protection. In Sweden, which has taken in the second-highest number of asylum seekers in Europe — and the highest number per capita — migration authorities might establish safe zones for women at asylum centers, where Christians and gays have also reported harassment.
Discussions about the influx of refugees into Europe have tended to focus on logistics, such as how to provide enough beds for the 1.1 million asylum seekers who arrived in Germany last year, or the more than 160,000 who arrived in Sweden. However, as the conflicts in asylum centers reveal, the challenge is far more complex than that.
Indeed, the refugee crisis in Europe is more a matter of culture than of numbers. Cultural clashes are much harder to address than logistics — especially once they leave the regulated confines of the asylum center, which can mitigate potential conflicts with surveillance and design. How will individuals who cannot share a shelter with gays and Christians without harassing them be able to integrate into liberal European societies?
The German and Swedish governments have not placed a high priority on addressing this question. Both have failed to take seriously the cultural differences — on issues such as women’s rights, minority rights, family honor and individual liberties — between asylum seekers, mainly from the Middle East and North Africa, and the European societies where they hope to live. In Sweden, in particular, a strong commitment to political correctness has severely limited public debate.
In ignoring the differences, the political elites in Germany and Sweden are risking some of their countries’ most valuable social assets, including security, stability, equality, tolerance and individual freedom. Yet they fail to note the risks. They act like their hard-won social advantages are inexhaustible natural resources, rather than the product of centuries of development — a product that is far more fragile than is widely assumed.
Perhaps the most obvious example of the threat European societies faces occurred in Cologne, Germany, on New Year’s Eve last year, when more than 600 women were sexually assaulted — and in some cases also robbed — by large gangs of men, most of whom were illegal immigrants or asylum seekers. Only four of the 153 suspects detained were German nationals.
Although mass sexual abuse is not unheard of in Europe, it has historically occurred only during conflicts — for example, during the Balkan wars of the 1990s and in the areas occupied by the Soviet Red Army at the end of World War II. What happened in Cologne in December last year has no equivalent in peacetime Western Europe.
Nor was it a one-off event. Shortly after the news of the Cologne attacks broke, it was revealed that similar attacks had taken place at the We Are Stockholm youth festival in the Swedish capital two years in a row, with young refugee men encircling and sexually assaulting teenage girls. Police had to escort 200 male attendees from the festival area last year.
For Roger Ticoalu, who heads the Stockholm City Government’s events department, and his colleagues, the assaults were utterly shocking.
“When we got the first indications of what happened,” he explained, “we didn’t think it could be true.”
Yet it was not just true; it was pervasive — and it has continued in other contexts.
Over the past six months, reports of harassment at public bathhouses in Sweden have multiplied, with the same group approach — “a new phenomenon for us,” according to the director of a public pool in Ostersund, a city in Sweden’s north — employed repeatedly.
In Bornheim, Germany, male asylum seekers had to be banned temporarily from a local bathhouse in January, after complaints of sexual harassment.
In response to the mounting anecdotal evidence of sexual abuse, Swedish police undertook an analysis of all harassment that has been occurring in public spaces. Their findings confirm that there is a problem with immigrants acting in groups to attack women and girls.
In response to this so-called “culture clash,” Sweden has launched an initiative to educate young asylum seekers about gender equality. Likewise, Germany created an informational Web site, offering advice on sex and sexuality, among other topics. Whether or not such initiatives ultimately have an impact, there is no denying that in Germany and Sweden — two of the world’s most open, tolerant, and equitable societies — women and girls face a new reality.
German and Swedish authorities have already had to take measures to protect women in public spaces.
At the beginning of the year, Stockholm’s largest public bathhouse introduced single-sex time slots for the whirlpool; shortly thereafter, police officers began patrolling the area. At this year’s We Are Stockholm festival, there is to be both a larger police presence and widespread video surveillance.
Large numbers of police, together with safe zones for women, helped to protect against mass sexual assaults at the carnival festivities in Cologne in February. However, as the debate over refugees rages on, one must ask: Are “safe zones for women” Europe’s future?
Paulina Neuding is a cofounder of the Freedom Rights Project.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS