Can the UK ever reconcile itself to being part of Europe? If recent British newspaper headlines about Thursday’s referendum on continued EU membership are any guide, the answer appears to be a decisive “no.”
Proponents of leaving the EU have campaigned on fear of runaway immigration and a cascade of purported dangers — whether delivered by boat or bomb — to the British way of life. Their opponents, who want the UK to remain part of Europe, highlight another fear: the loss of jobs that are dependent on European trade.
The nonstop sloganeering around the platforms has exposed conflicting worldviews. The rhetoric of the “Leave” supporters conjures up the spirit of Dunkirk in 1940 — a nation standing alone, impervious to invading armadas and armies, and always fiercely independent of Europe.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In theory, the “Remain” campaign stands for a different Britain: Outward-looking, engaged and internationally minded. However, the Conservative Party is bitterly divided on the issue and many of its most prominent spokesmen have wilted under fire from a hostile Euroskeptic media. As a result, they often seem to be advocating for a half-in, half-out relationship with Europe — for a Britain that is semi-detached, rather than fully engaged. A positive, principled, and progressive case for British membership in the EU has yet to be made.
Positive arguments are the sharpest arrows in the quiver of those who want Britain to remain in Europe. Meeting the needs and aspirations of the British people in the 21st century requires us to let go of the past, acknowledge that the present is defined by globalization and recognize that the future is filled with opportunity. Our increased interdependence suggests the need for greater international cooperation and coordination, and that is precisely what the EU offers.
BRINGING BACK CONTROL
Because “Leave” voters view globalization as a liability, they look for protection and insulation, demanding that “control” be brought back home. One recent, but not necessarily representative, poll found that 43 percent of those certain to vote favored bringing control back to the UK by leaving the EU — even if they were to become financially worse off as a result. Only 23 percent did not.
A casual observer could be forgiven for thinking that forging a post-referendum national consensus on a European future is impossible. However, there is a way forward. We must start by recognizing that in an increasingly integrated and interdependent world, each country needs to strike the right balance between the national autonomy that it desires and the international cooperation that it requires.
Britain should not have to choose between two absolutes: Total autonomy, which would undervalue the need to cooperate with our nearest neighbors, and complete integration into a European superstate, which would fail to recognize the continuing importance of national identities and decisionmaking.
Issue by issue, there is a way forward that will make both Britain and Europe more competitive, democratic and accountable. If we can show that opportunity, fairness, safety and security can be enhanced in Europe — and that we can be a proud leader of the EU’s reform agenda — a British consensus might begin to emerge.
Take the economy. By balancing autonomy and cooperation, Britain could create 500,000 more jobs during the next decade. Because it has not adopted the euro, the UK has retained the autonomy to set interest rates; but integration into Europe’s single market has yielded clear gains in terms of growth and employment. Similarly, if Britain were to lead efforts to establish a level playing field for digital, energy, and services — particularly financial services — it could ensure greater competitiveness for Europe as a whole.
Economic reforms are only the beginning. Britain can and should champion an agenda that confronts questions of energy efficiency (through an energy and environmental union), fair taxation (through a plan for dealing with tax havens) and security (through heightened cross-border intelligence gathering and policing against terrorism and illegal immigration).
BOLD BLUEPRINT
The British blueprint for a reformed Europe should be bold and far-sighted, recognizing the social dimension to the single market and deepening pan-European collaboration in scientific research. By embracing the reality that we can achieve more through cooperation than isolation, such a blueprint could become the agenda for the UK presidency of the EU next year and usher in an era of greater cross-border engagement.
We could also use this moment of leadership to advocate for a more cooperative approach to international development and conflict resolution, including a modern European-led Marshall Plan for North Africa and the Middle East.
Britain has an opportunity to be at the forefront of shaping the next stage of Europe’s development. For the last, post-imperial half-century, Britain has struggled to find a role that suits our sense of destiny. Through active engagement with Europe, we can show that we are more than one half of a special relationship with the US, more than one-28th of the NATO alliance and much more than just one member of an ever-growing EU. On Thursday, we should demonstrate that Britain’s future lies in leading Europe, not in leaving it.
Gordon Brown, a former British prime minister and chancellor of the exchequer, is UN special envoy for global education and chair of the International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity.Copyright: Project Syndicate
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
Since taking office, President William Lai (賴清德) has been an active proponent of the Healthy Taiwan initiative. As a member of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, I have also contributed recommendations on various pharmaceutical policies. After the committee concluded its seventh meeting on Saturday last week, Lai announced that the government is considering a three-year suspension on the Drug Expenditure Target (DET) system’s routine drug price surveys, highlighting the need to further support drug supply resilience. While I am supportive of this policy direction, I must also stress the importance of maintaining our original objective of improving the quality of
RSS