On Thursday and Friday last week, the World Trade Institute, the Swiss National Center of Competence in Research and Klaipedos Nafta co-organized an international energy forum in Vilnius, Lithuania, that discussed the development of cross-border energy trade, the decarbonization of energy markets and global energy cooperation.
The aspects of the forum that were most relevant for Taiwan pertain to Lithuania’s reforms for energy independence.
Lithuania was 100 percent dependent on oil and gas imports from Russia, but is now 100 percent independent, with a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal built at the Klaipeda seaport, and power links to Sweden and Poland.
The Klaipeda LNG terminal has allowed the nation to obtain a 23 percent discount on natural gas prices. Of the three Baltic states, Lithuania has the lowest LNG price for industrial consumers and the price for households is just slightly higher than in Estonia. In addition, the electricity price in the Lithuanian trading zone at the Nord Pool exchange fell by 18 percent following the completion of the power transmission system to Sweden and Poland.
Looking at the achievements, it is possible to extract three important elements of the reform process: The Lithuanian model emphasizes the role of trade and investment regulations; the country has established a well-designed regulatory environment for the implementation of infrastructure projects; and the authorities implement policy solutions for energy security, economic growth and energy decarbonization simultaneously.
In short, Lithuania not only sees energy market reform as a national issue, but also as a regional and international one. Lithuania has become a global player in the energy sector, and its Klaipeda LNG terminal has the potential of becoming a major hub for joint LNG purchases in the entire Baltic Sea region and beyond. For instance, neighboring Finland ought to use the Klaipeda LNG terminal and the bunkering facilities to boost Finnish domestic competition.
However, in Taiwan, mainstream discussions on energy matters have not properly addressed the importance of international trade rules, mega-regional trade deals and the regulatory design for promoting infrastructure investment. On the one hand, Taiwan depends on imports for about 98 percent of its energy consumption, and on the other, its renewable energy technologies and energy-saving services are still attractive to major international markets. Therefore, facilitating a multilateral solution that combines energy, environmental and economic considerations is a feasible option for Taiwan.
Based on existing WTO and APEC models, the government might first consider observing the International Energy Charter. This treaty — known as “WTO-plus” in the energy sector — outlines principles for cross-national energy cooperation and offers comprehensive mechanisms for investment protection, freedom of energy transmission and international dispute settlements, thereby mitigating risks associated with energy-related trade and investment.
In addition, as Japan regards entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership as paving the way for US booming shale-gas output and future LNG deals, Taiwan should reflect on its strategies of energy security and the benefits of international trade and investment in the context of both multilateral and bilateral economic integration.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association. His doctoral research examines the interactions between international environmental law and investment law.
Ideas matter. They especially matter in world affairs. And in communist countries, it is communist ideas, not supreme leaders’ personality traits, that matter most. That is the reality in the People’s Republic of China. All Chinese communist leaders — from Mao Zedong (毛澤東) through Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), from Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) through to Xi Jinping (習近平) — have always held two key ideas to be sacred and self-evident: first, that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is infallible, and second, that the Marxist-Leninist socialist system of governance is superior to every alternative. The ideological consistency by all CCP leaders,
The US on Friday hosted the second Global COVID-19 Summit, with at least 98 countries, including Taiwan, and regional alliances such as the G7, the G20, the African Union and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) attending. Washington is also leading a proposal to revise one of the most important documents in global health security — the International Health Regulations (IHR) — which are to be discussed during the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) that starts on Sunday. These two actions highlight the US’ strategic move to dominate the global health agenda and return to the core of governance, with the WHA
Just as the cause of the Kursk submarine disaster remains shrouded in mystery — the nuclear-powered Russian submarine suffered an explosion during a naval exercise on Aug. 12, 2000, and sank, killing all 118 crew onboard — it is unlikely that we will ever get to the bottom of the sequence of events last month that led to the sinking of the Moskva guided missile cruiser, the flagship of the Russian navy’s Black Sea fleet. Ukraine claims it struck the vessel with two missiles, while Russia says ammunition onboard the ship exploded and the ship tipped over while being towed
The war in Ukraine continues, and lines are slowly being drawn in the sand. Nations have begun imposing sanctions; few can ignore the reality of Russia’s aggression and atrocities, especially as it edges to the possibility of making a full declaration of war. For Taiwan, this resurrects a different reality, the tangled web of its own complex past and how as a colony of Japan, it became involved with Russia, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Some role reversals are immediately evident. Taiwan is now an independent nation and the CCP rules China. The CCP indirectly
RSS