There is an Atayal word, spiyang, that refers to behavior that is inappropriate or wrong, but which a person continues to do nevertheless. As I watched the inauguration of the 14th president of the Republic of China (ROC) on May 20, I really did get the sense there was little of the regimented, bureaucratic felt in previous years.
For Aborigines who have been subjected to colonial rule and feel they have not been respected, this year’s event, with different — read non-Han Chinese — ethnic groups and cultures, people from all walks of life, new immigrants — “foreigners” — and Aborigines alike all represented, was certainly a welcome break from the past.
However, during the proceedings, there were two points in the Taiwan zhi guang (“the glories of Taiwan,” 台灣之光) section that were questionable. In the first part about the good fortune of the Aborigines and their rich culture, the narrator said foreign missionaries changed Aborigines’ rather uncivilized conventions, in what was a clearly prejudiced view of Aboriginal culture, together with a misunderstanding of what the missionaries were here for.
All cultures are equal. There is no “better” or “worse” culture. Such a viewpoint has no place in a democratic, civilized nation.
The second part, dealing with Japanese colonial rule, spoke only of the negative aspects of that period. It depicted Japanese invading and suppressing the local populace, but mentioned nothing of the infrastructure Japanese gave Taiwanese. Japanese laid down much of the foundations of Taiwan’s national progress — in agriculture, medicine, arts and literature, education, science and transportation — and these things should have been represented. Surely the omissions were disrespectful to the more than 100 Japanese dignitaries in attendance.
Regarding mentions of Aborigines in President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inaugural address — including re-evaluating Aboriginal history, moving toward autonomy, restoring Aboriginal language and culture and improving people’s lives — it was entirely commendable and worth applauding.
Whether this translates into how the government approaches Aboriginal affairs, and how it develops its policy on education, economics, culture and politics, on all levels of government and in the mountain communities remains to be seen. People must keep an eye on how things progress in that regard.
The government will have to exhibit an entirely new level of commitment and approach to the issues, compared with previous governments, in its first 100 days in power. Hopefully it will, but that does not mean people intend to just sit by to see if the government improves.
It will take Taiwan’s Aborigines working in concert with other nationalities before they see a new dawn. That also means that the nation as a whole needs to face up to the violence the state has visited upon Aborigines and offer an apology.
For Taiwan, it does not matter which party is in control. As far as Aborigines are concerned, they will always be seen as something “other” to the Han Chinese population. If people cannot get beyond stereotypes the nation simply can not achieve true ethnic integration or justice and freedom for everyone.
If Taiwan is to become a free, democratic nation founded on human rights, where justice and compassion reign, Taiwanese have to rectify how they view Aborigines, who have historically been at the wrong end of state violence, and reflect on and change the improper and ill-advised policy toward Aborigines. This will be one of the main bellwethers by which the government will be evaluated.
Omi Wilang is a pastor at the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan and secretary-general of the Indigenous Peoples’ Action Coalition of Taiwan.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS