Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her government, the Bangladesh Awami League, is under growing pressure to end an apparent culture of impunity after a series of brutal murders of secular writers, bloggers and liberal intellectuals by radical Muslims.
A torrent of protest followed the latest killings on Monday night of Xulhaz Mannan, editor of the country’s only lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender magazine, and Mahbub Rabbi Tonoy, an actor and fellow gay rights activist. Critics have accused the government of failing to act effectively to stop the carnage.
“It is shocking that no one has been held to account for these horrific attacks and that almost no protection has been given to threatened members of civil society,” said Amnesty International’s Champa Patel, reacting to the four killings so far this month.
US Secretary of State John Kerry echoed the criticism, along with other western leaders. Similar protests by Bangladeshi free speech activists and well-known foreign writers have had little discernible effect in the past.
Since 2013, attacks characterized by the assailants’ use of machetes and cleavers have claimed the lives of secular bloggers, authors, journalists, academics and teachers of a supposedly liberal bent. The common denominator is the offense their views supposedly cause to hardline Muslims among Bangladesh’s mostly moderate and tolerant Sunni Muslim majority.
Westerners in general have also been randomly targeted in the past 12 months, as have members of Bangladesh’s Shiite and Ahmadi Muslim minorities, Hindus and Christian converts.
The geographical spread is expanding, too. Whereas attacks were initially mostly confined to highly observant rural areas, the murder of Mannan and his friend took place in the heart of the capital, Dhaka.
The official response has been seen as largely inadequate. Seven men were convicted last year of a 2013 attack, but most of the murders have gone unsolved and unpunished. This might be in part because Bangladesh is a poor country with a badly resourced police force.
Government curbs on media, television and social media have been blamed for a lack of scrutiny of the growth of religious extremism and of the meek official response. At the same time, the spread of jihadi ideology is linked to the increased use of social media in Bangladesh.
However, such factors aside, Hasina and the Awami League stand accused of a lack of political will, and more broadly, of risking the collapse of Bangladesh’s secular, post-independence democratic tradition by marginalizing the main opposition party, the Bangladesh Nationalist party (BNP), and over-controlling the national political discourse.
POLARIZATION
In typically uncompromising fashion, Hasina bluntly blamed the BNP and its Muslim political ally, the Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) party, for the latest deaths.
“The BNP-Jamaat nexus has been engaged in such secret and heinous murders in various forms to destabilize the country... Such killings are being staged in a planned way,” Hasina said.
The government flatly denies international militant groups, such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda are active in the country, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. It claims the killers belong to home-grown groups.
Contradicting official claims, the banned group Ansar al-Islam — the Bangladeshi branch of al-Qaeda on the Indian subcontinent — on Tuesday claimed responsibility for killing the two gay rights activists in what it called a “blessed attack.”
It said the two were killed because they were “pioneers of practicing and promoting homosexuality in Bangladesh” and were “working day and night to promote homosexuality ... with the help of their masters, the US crusaders and its Indian allies.”
Bangladeshi ministers have argued that a crackdown on militant groups could offend religious sensibilities and cause more problems than it would solve.
Interviewed by the Guardian last autumn, Hasina blamed Britain and unnamed Arab countries for tolerating the rise and global spread of radical Muslim ideas, and in some cases nurturing and funding hardline groups.
“The British government should take more steps on the ground. Jamaat has a strong influence in east London. That’s true; they are collecting money, they are sending money,” she said.
Bangladeshi opposition parties claim the government’s alleged exploitation of the country’s international crimes tribunal investigating mass killings at the time of Bangladesh’s 1971 war of liberation is fueling extremist violence.
The JEI backed Pakistan against the independence fighters led by Hasina’s father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who was later murdered.
Several JEI leaders have been sentenced to death or to long prison terms since the tribunal process was launched by Hasina in 2009, to the fury of their hardline supporters.
Bangladesh’s overall inability to come to grips with extremism is in part the result of a fractured political space, where legitimate criticism and debate are increasingly restricted, analysts in Dhaka said.
The Awami League’s dominance, coupled with grinding poverty, ongoing human rights abuses and an ineffective, divided opposition, is causing growing polarization and political stagnation, and placing democracy at risk.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,