In the run-up to president-elect Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) inauguration on May 20, China has begun to use its political and economic muscle to marginalize Taiwan in global diplomacy.
Recent weeks have seen intensifying efforts from China to poach Taiwan’s remaining allies. Beijing’s economic clout and international prestige make it an irresistible attraction to Taiwan’s few allies. China offers huge amounts of financial assistance that Taiwan can never match.
Last month, the Gambia established diplomatic ties with China after previously recognizing Taiwan. As a result, Taiwan has only 22 diplomatic allies remaining: the Vatican City in Europe; Burkina Faso, Sao Tome and Principe, and Swaziland in Africa; Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, the Marshall Islands, the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu in Oceania; and Belize, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in Central and South America and the Caribbean Community.
Also, China limits Taiwan’s participation in various global organizations, such as the World Organization for Animal Health, the Internet Corporation on Assigned Names and Numbers, and the Kimberly Process. After Taiwan was expelled from the WHO according to World Health Assembly Resolution 25.1 in 1972, Taiwan requested admission into the World Health Assembly as an observer in 1997, but China mobilized its allies in the developing world to deny the request at the General Committee of the World Health Assembly. Taipei has made the same request every year and Beijing has it rejected each time.
China has launched a global campaign to isolate the nation by demanding that Taiwan change its official title to Chinese Taipei or withdraw from international organizations. In 2007, China pushed for a resolution in the World Organization for Animal Health to support its idea that “there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is an inalienable part of the Chinese territory, and the government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing all China.”
The resolution was designed to change Taiwan’s status from a full member to a non-sovereign regional member, and to alter its title from the Republic of China on Taiwan to Taiwan, China. The US and its allies compromised and acknowledged this “one China” principle.
As China becomes more active in international organizations, it has forged alliances with many countries to isolate Taiwan.
All these examples exhibit an aggressive effort by Beijing to force the world’s acceptance of China’s superiority as the new norm of international diplomacy, global healthcare management and transnational cultural affairs.
Taiwan should take a critical look at cross-strait ties and China’s hardball diplomacy. Eight years ago, after his electoral victory in 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called for a diplomatic truce and strove to reduce cross-strait tensions. China accepted Ma’s request, but the decision led to bureaucratic rivalries between its Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Taiwan Affairs Office.
The ministry viewed any diplomatic gain against Taiwan as a departmental success. For each nation that switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China, the ministry would get funds to build a new embassy abroad. However, the Taiwan Affairs Office argued that China’s diplomatic gains outraged the Taiwanese public, who consider China an aggressive bully rather than a peaceful neighbor.
Since it was important for Taiwan to keep its remaining allies, China accepted Ma’s request for a diplomatic truce to improve Beijing’s public image among Taiwanese and to support Ma’s policy of “three links” — direct postal, transportation and trade links with China.
Despite the odds, all is not yet lost for Taiwan. The US’ pivot to East Asia is designed to deter China and reassure regional allies. The severity of China’s economic crises has challenged Taiwan to reassess its financial rapprochement with Beijing. Many people hope that Tsai will articulate a new vision of Taiwan’s international status and pursue an agenda of diplomatic activism. Only by doing so will the nation win much diplomatic recognition from developed and developing countries, and participate in wider sociocultural, economic, scientific and religious platforms.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history at Pace University in New York.
Oppression is painful, and not being able to express it increases the pain 10-fold. This level of pain is something that Uighurs, Tibetans and Mongolians understand all too well. A question often posed to Uighurs in the international arena is: “You say you are facing genocide, but why don’t we see corpses, like in Rwanda and in Bosnia?” If you were a Uighur, what would you say? What if you replied: “The source of the problem is your lack of vision. It’s an indication of your weakness and China’s strength, and it is not a matter of our sincerity.” Such a harsh response would
Double Ten Day, Oct. 10 every year, is an important day for Taiwan, as it marks the Republic of China’s (ROC) National Day. Major holidays are usually a time for celebration and commemorative activities, but among all the clamor and excitement, Double Ten reflects one essential fact: that Taiwan is still not a normalized society. As usual, there was a large parade in front of the Presidential Office Building, displaying to the world Taiwan’s social diversity and its soft and hard power, and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) gave an address, relaying her message to the nation and to the world, while the
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) Double Ten National Day address has attracted a great deal of analysis and many different interpretations. One core question is why Tsai chose this occasion to discuss Taiwan’s national status. What was her main motive and what effect did she intend to have? These are issues that clearly need further clarification. The section of Tsai’s speech that attracted the most attention internationally was, not surprisingly, the part where she laid out “four commitments” that she said should serve as common ground for all Taiwanese, regardless of political affiliation. The commitments were to liberal democracy and constitutional government; that the
Ever since former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was recalled last year, “Han fans,” as well as the KMT hierarchy, have made pro-Taiwan lawmakers their enemy No. 1, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) has been on top of that list (“Recall part of ‘generational war’: expert,” Oct. 19, page 3). Chen has always been one of Han’s harshest critics, and Han fans have vowed revenge. Former legislators Yen Kuan-hen (顏寬恆) and Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), being such sore losers, were not amused about losing to Chen democratically and have amassed significant resources backed by