If one fist bump could endanger Finland’s increasingly stressed tradition of consensus politics, then Finnish Prime Minister Juha Sipila and a Cabinet colleague may just have achieved this dubious distinction.
In a nod to popular culture, a smiling Sipila and Finnish Minister of Finance Alexander Stubb punched each other’s fists to celebrate a breakthrough in negotiating one of Finland’s toughest austerity deals in decades with trade unions.
The unions, whose members face de facto wage cuts in the name of reviving economic growth, were deeply unimpressed by the public show of exuberance earlier this month.
Illustration: Mountain people
“Members were very upset. They thought that they were mocking workers, saying something like: ‘Now we can drive them into the ground,’” said PAM union leader Ann Selin, who represents 232,000 workers.
The fist bump was not a first in international politics. Barack and Michelle Obama exchanged one at the Democratic party convention before his election to the US presidency in 2008.
However, Sipila and Stubb are hardly the golden couple of Finnish politics. Before becoming prime minister, Sipila was a millionaire businessman while Stubb has the image of a jet setter with a liking for fine suits.
This made the gesture all the more difficult to stomach for union leaders after what was only a preliminary deal, with a detailed agreement still to be hammered out in the coming months.
“It did not help at all,” Selin said.
Unions were outraged at politicians who appeared out of touch, underlying the fragility of the Nordic model, under which parties of the center-right and center-left, organized labor and business strive to reach consensus deals without conflict.
The danger is that the preliminary accord might still collapse as the Finnish consensus is tested by rising debt, unemployment and lengthy economic stagnation.
Relying on traditional consensus politics, Sipila wants to persuade the unions to cut labor costs by 5 percent. It is part of his push to raise the competitiveness of the Finnish economy after three years of recession with some of the deepest austerity and welfare since World War II.
With unemployment at 9.4 percent, Stubb said the fist bump was to celebrate the new jobs that he believes the reforms will create.
He has heralded a Finnish spring of “three big decisions that need to be taken to change the course of the country” — the labor deal, a parliamentary vote on budget cuts and reforms to cut the cost of healthcare.
NOT VERY FINNISH
At stake is the consensus that has grown across the high-cost Nordic welfare states out of the realisation that small, export-dependent economies can ill afford polarization and policy stagnation.
Nowhere is that consensus under such risk as in Finland, called “the sick man of Europe” by Stubb and now facing the same dilemma as many other eurozone economies of how to promote growth while also pursuing fiscal austerity.
Having long lectured southern European countries such as Greece on tackling their problems, Finland is belatedly coming to reform itself.
The demise of Nokia’s phone business and the electronics industry has shaved 3 percent off Finnish GDP since 2007, with the shrinking wood industry cutting another 0.75 percent, according to Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD) economists.
Economic crisis in Russia, a close trade partner, has cut another 1.5 percent off Finnish output in the past three years, they say.
This year, Finland has lost its “triple-A” credit rating.
The European Commission has warned Helsinki about its rising debt and budget deficit, although last year the shortfall was equal to 2.7 percent of GDP, within the EU limit.
Still, public spending is 58 percent of GDP, the highest in the OECD group of developed economies. Exports remain 20 percent below their peak reached in 2007 before the global crisis erupted.
Resistance to austerity is considerable. In the past few months, parts of Helsinki have been brought to a standstill by protesting farmers driving tractors, while thousands of pensioners and students have also taken to streets.
Selin described the preliminary labor deal as “the lesser of two evils,” but said: “I have never seen the consensus model under such pressure. I have never seen so many demonstrations.”
“It’s not very Finnish,” she added.
NO REVOLUTION, YET
Stubb acknowledges no one wants to bear the brunt of the reforms.
“There is consensus in Finland that we need to turn the tide of debt, but there is clearly no consensus on where we do those cuts,” he said.
He made clear the government dislikes “revolution” — forcing through reforms that could polarize society.
“We decided that we’ll go through evolution, a bit by bit, but ... you have to be pretty sure that you meet those targets, otherwise at the end of the day you’ll have to go for the revolution,” he said.
Planned budget spending cuts would save 4 billion euros (US$4.5 billion) by 2019, equal to 2 percent of GDP. Social and health reforms would cut 3 billion euros, or 1.5 percent of GDP, according to the OECD.
Stubb has warned that if the labor reforms are watered down when unions and employers negotiate the final deal, the government could try to force through more radical cuts.
Sipila and Stubb have to walk a political tightrope on each of the three reforms, facing infighting within the three-party center-right coalition government and voters’ anger with planned spending cuts from education to child benefits.
Critics say Stubb is part of the problem.
Many Finns are wary of the extrovert and social media-savvy politician, mistrusting his image as a right-wing ideologue. He even faces a possible challenge to his party leadership.
Stubb’s cherished labor deal cuts to the heart of Finnish welfare.
If he gets his way, employees might work an extra 24 hours a year for no extra pay, but with increased pension contributions. Beloved benefits, such as a 50 percent bonus on monthly pay in the summer holidays, might be trimmed.
CLUELESS ON GROWTH
“Finland has lost its values,” said Arto Annila, a physics professor who was among 75 academics at Helsinki University to be made redundant.
Aged 53, it was the first time he has lost his job.
“Before you had a sense these were jobs for life,” he said.
Anger with these cuts — altogether about 980 jobs are going from the university’s staff — has helped the opposition center-left Social Democratic Party (SDP) rise to top in polls.
They advocate less austerity and more investment.
“Europe has generally done too much cutting,” said Sanna Marin, 30-year-old SDP vice chairwoman, who warns the coalition could fall before its term ends in 2019.
Her hometown suffers 18 percent unemployment.
“I think we have the fiscal room to invest,” she said.
However, few economists see any magic wand to boost growth, given how few new industries are making up for weakness of Finland’s electronic and forestry exports.
“We are all clueless on how to get long-term economic growth,” Helsinki University professor of public finances Markus Jantti said.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use