The state of China’s economy, and its impact on the country’s social and political stability, continues to figure prominently, even more so in the context of this month’s National People’s Congress (NPC) meeting.
China’s economy has slowed down from its double-digit growth some years ago to just below 7 percent. There are even suggestions that real growth might be much lower, probably as low as half of that.
At about 7 percent though, China’s economy is doing much better than most other countries. However, there are serious problems emerging and some of them were acknowledged by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) in his annual state-of-the-nation report to the NPC.
For instance, talking of the economy in general, Li said in his report that: “Domestically, problems and risks that have been building up over the years are becoming more evident,” and as a result, “downward pressure on the economy is increasing.”
However, he maintained that, with appropriate adjustments, it would be possible for China to achieve an average annual growth rate of 6.5 percent in the next five years.
So what are these problems? A major problem is that over the years some crucial industries have built up overcapacity that is weighing down the general economy. For instance, there is now a glut of coal, cement, steel and other industrial commodities. Even as these industries have created high levels of pollution, their profits have declined and some are even losing money. These and other industrial enterprises would need to be overhauled or closed, leading to massive job losses, and it is already happening.
As Li said: “We will focus on addressing the overcapacity in the steel, coal and other industries facing difficulties. We will address the issue of ‘zombie enterprises’ proactively, yet prudently, by using measures such as mergers, reorganizations, debt restructurings and bankruptcy liquidations.”
In other words, the economy is set to undergo a severe shake-up and the resultant loss of jobs will no doubt cause social unrest.
The legitimacy of China’s political system is largely based on an implied contract between the regime and China’s masses, where its people abide by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) monopoly on power in return for a progressive improvement in their economic conditions. The government is not unaware of the social problems that might arise from the loss of millions of jobs and is setting aside about US$15 billion to support laid-off workers. However, such economic disruptions are never easy and inevitably cause social unrest.
Already, protests are happening in some regions and industries — mining for instance — over job losses and unpaid wages. The scale and management of such unrest will be an important challenge for the political system. The economic turbulence recently experienced by China’s stock market, affecting millions of small investors earlier encouraged by the government to make good money through this seemingly ever-expanding channel, is another example of the general malaise. At the same time, its exports sector, once an important source of economic growth, has slowed down, which has also caused unemployment.
Faced with slow economic growth and its inevitable social consequences, the Chinese government is easing its credit policy, though it is still not sure how much more liquidity to inject. Such ambivalence is the result of a mountain of debt that has piled up following the stimulation of the economy after the 2008-2009 global economic crisis. The total debt is said to be two-and-a-half years of its economic output, and there are questions being asked about its manageability. The views on this are varied. One view is that with its monopoly on power, the CCP will not allow things to get out of control in any and all spheres of national life. Which is true, but as previously demonstrated, its instruments of control did not help much when the stock market went berserk. If anything, it tended to aggravate the situation.
It has, of course, large foreign-exchange reserves of more than US$3 trillion, which might seem huge, but once the draw down begins, they might not last long. China has already spent some of these reserves to support its currency from falling too precipitously.
Then there is the flight of capital, caused by nervousness over the economy. As one US fund manager was quoted as saying in the Sydney Morning Herald: “There are 1.3 billion people in China. If 4 percent of the population took out their US$50,000 limit, the US$3.3 trillion in foreign reserves is gone.”
At the same time, there is said to be US$1 trillion dollars’ worth of seriously bad debt on Chinese banks’ books.
Developing his argument about serious risk for China’s economy, Kyle Bass, a fund manager at Dallas-based Hayman Capital Hedge Fund, was quoted as saying: “The Chinese financial system is overstretched [likely to be further overstretched with more easy money]. China let the banking system grow 1,000 percent in 10 years.”
“China’s [ratio of] bank deposits to resources is one of the worst in the world,” he added.
This cannot continue without causing economic tremors.
It is not a pretty picture. Its implications are quite bad for both global and domestic economies. China’s growth is now quite enmeshed into the global economy. Its stimulation after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis helped to mitigate the financial meltdown. In commodity-based economies like Australia, Canada, Brazil and others, it even ushered in a period of great prosperity. Now the slowdown and stock market gyrations are causing great economic distress in parts of the world because of falling demand from China for commodities like iron ore, coal, oil and gas.
There is a great need for China to stabilize its economy through sensible transition from an exports and construction-led phase, which is almost all it has known in the past few decades, to consumption-led domestic growth. The government knows this, but it is not working as well and as fast as it could.
In the interim, the restructuring of the economy leading to massive unemployment is creating unrest, and dealing with it through rough-and-ready and top-heavy exercise of power, which has been a feature of the system, will be quite challenging.
Indeed, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is busy further consolidating his power, being christened as the “core” leader in the tradition of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Does it mean, by any chance, that China’s “supreme” leader is gearing for uncertain times ahead?
All this does not mean that China’s economy or system is going to crumble. What it means is that the seriousness of its economic problems might set in motion a process over a period of time that might erode the legitimacy and durability of the communist regime, and all that underpins it.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic