It is a blot on the face of humanity that we have yet to eradicate slavery — of children, no less. Not only does child slavery persist; the number of child slaves, 5.5 million, has remained constant in the last two decades. They are bought and sold like animals, sometimes for less than a pack of cigarettes. Add to their number the 168 million child workers, 59 million out-of-school children and 15 million girls under 15 who are forced to marry every year, and the situation is beyond unacceptable.
Eighteen years ago, the Global March Against Child Labour spearheaded a global movement to bring child labor and child slavery to the attention of global leaders. Thanks to the invaluable contribution of fellow activists, workers, educators and businesses, the campaign was a resounding success, leading to the adoption of the International Labor Organization’s Worst Forms of Child Labor Convention.
However, there is clearly much work left to do. That is why the Global March Against Child Labour worked so hard — collecting 550,000 signatures on a petition — to push world leaders to include strong language against child slavery in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which is to guide global development efforts for the next 15 years. Among the SDG targets is one that aims to “eradicate forced labor, end modern slavery and human trafficking, and secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labor.”
However, now it is time to back that promise — one of 169 targets — with concerted action. After all, if child labor, slavery, human trafficking and violence against children continue, we would have failed to accomplish the agenda’s overarching goal of achieving inclusive and sustainable prosperity. And the responsibility does not lie only with governments; businesses, civil society and individual citizens must all contribute, not least by pressuring their leaders to make a change.
Consider the situation in India, where impending revisions to two major development policies — the National Education Policy and the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act — are heading in opposite directions. On the one hand, a new education policy has the potential to address child labor as a barrier to education and, more broadly, to improve the life prospects of millions of marginalized and deprived children. On the other hand, the proposed amendments to the Child Labour Act would erect new barriers to further progress on education.
Specifically, the changes to the Child Labour Act would allow children under the age of 14 to help their families in “non-hazardous” family enterprises or the entertainment industry. This may sound innocuous, but it fails to acknowledge a stark and undisputable reality: Work for “family enterprises” can be as brutal as any other kind. And the list of “hazardous” occupations is far from complete.
Before being rescued by my organization, Bachpan Bachao Andolan, eight-year-old Arpita was forced to work 16 to 18 hour days in the home of her uncle as domestic “help.” When we rescued her, we had to break down the door. It was the dead of winter, and she was barely clothed and severely malnourished, covered in wounds, and cowering under a rag on her uncle’s balcony.
Likewise, when we rescued 10-year-old Mohsin and eight-year-old Aslam in 2007 from a sweatshop — owned by their uncle — where they made children’s clothing for one of world’s largest garment retailers, they were starving. The jobs performed by Arpita, Mohsin, and Aslam would not be considered “hazardous” under the amended act.
In a recent analysis, we found that one-fifth of the children under age 14 rescued by Bachpan Bachao Andolan were working in family enterprises. More than 40 percent of the rescued children were performing hazardous jobs — for example, working in roadside restaurants (dhabas) or manufacturing garments, leather goods, cosmetics, or electronics — that would be allowed under the amended act.
There are millions of enslaved Arpitas, Mohsins, and Aslams. However, if the proposed amendments are adopted, we would not be able to rescue a single child under 14 years of age who is employed by his or her “family” — no matter how vile the conditions of their servitude. The impact — not just on individual children, but also on the future of our society — would be devastating. On behalf of India’s children, we call upon the Indian parliament to do the right thing and reject the proposed amendments to the Child Labour Act.
Beyond India, the imperative to protect children is just as strong. If we are to realize the future promised in the SDGs, surely we must do everything in our power to protect the fundamental human rights of every person, especially the most vulnerable. That is why governments worldwide must deepen their commitment to pursuing child-friendly policies and investing in the protection and education of their young people.
My colleagues and I have humbly done our part over the years, rescuing more than 84,000 children from despicable conditions. It has not been enough to end the blight of child slavery, but to those children and their families, it has meant everything.
Still, far too many children remain enslaved, missing out not just on their childhood, but also on the chance for a happy, healthy and prosperous future. It is time for the world to stand up and lend its voice to those whose cannot. We must demand that our leaders fulfill their promise of ensuring that every child’s life is free from exploitation, enriched by education and full of promise. Our generation can and should be the one that ends child slavery forever.
Kailash Satyarthi is a children’s rights activist in India and co-winner of last year’s Nobel Peace Prize.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS