When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) convened a group of top officials to discuss the nation’s economy last month, the highly publicized meeting was seen as a moment of triumph.
A stock market plunge last summer and a messy currency devaluation that followed had faded from global view. In the relative calm, Xi seemed to usher in a new era of economic management, promising policy coordination at the highest levels to prevent another bout of turmoil.
Less than three weeks later, his plans have been derailed as China’s stock market and currency once again rattle investors around the world. The latest rout sets up a challenge for Xi, who has positioned himself as the master of the nation’s economy.
Illustration: Yusha
At every turn, his efforts to manage the economy, market and currency have been undercut by global headwinds and haphazard policymaking, and initiatives last week were particularly discordant.
He also cannot move forward on the bolder actions needed to head off a more serious economic slump, such as forcing hopelessly indebted state-owned enterprises to stop borrowing money and shut down. Otherwise, he risks further eroding short-term confidence and growth, which have depended heavily on this borrow-and-spend mentality, and mass layoffs could follow.
Xi’s options are also more limited than in the past. He and his aides engineered the elevation of the renminbi to the ranks of the world’s leading currencies, a status bestowed by the IMF in November last year. However, in doing so, he gave up some control, allowing market forces to play a bigger role.
In the past couple of years, China had begun allowing, even encouraging, companies and people to invest more of their wealth overseas. Doing so helped reduce deflationary pressures at home from chronic overinvestment and overcapacity, and increased China’s influence around the world.
However, a trickle of money leaving China to buy houses and other overseas investments has become a flood this winter. The central bank has responded by trying, for the past three weeks, to slowly guide the currency down as a way to help bolster exports and also make overseas investments seem more expensive and less appealing.
The result has been chaotic. With the renminbi worth less by the day in the international markets, Chinese families and companies worry that their renminbi wealth might buy less tomorrow, spurring faster capital flight and worsening the currency turmoil.
This week, regulators put in place a so-called circuit breaker for the stock market, a mechanism that halts trading when shares fall too steeply. The new measure, which followed last summer’s market slide, was aimed at stabilizing stocks, but in practice, it has amplified anxiety.
Another measure, which banned large shareholders from selling stock, was supposed to expire on Friday. The looming deadline prompted smaller investors to dump shares.
“These very high-level bodies were supposed to coordinate policy, and, in this case, there really was a failure of coordination,” said Victor Shih (史宗瀚), a specialist in Chinese financial policy at the University of California, San Diego.
The resulting stress drove share prices in China down 12 percent last week. The fall would have been even steeper if the new rules had not shut down the market repeatedly.
The combination — a troubled stock market and currency — has proved worrisome for global investors. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index, the main benchmark in the US, was off 2 percent on Thursday, and European and Asian shares were down broadly.
In a stark about-face, the Chinese stock market regulator on Thursday night said that it would suspend the new measure “in order to preserve market stability.” It is also extending the selling ban for another three months.
Few analysts had expected such a quick retreat.
“Removing the circuit breakers now means they have to admit they made a mistake,” Bocom International Holdings Co chief China strategist Hao Hong (洪灝) said earlier in the day.
For years, the response to economic weakness has been the same in China: spend, spend, spend.
When the global financial crisis hit in 2008, the Chinese authorities developed a US$585 billion stimulus package. The money, funneled into infrastructure, high-speed rail lines and intercity highways, helped protect China against the problems plaguing the US and much of the world.
In some way, China is reverting to its old tactics.
Over the past few months, the government has cut interest rates and introduced numerous measures to help stimulate growth. The central bank’s response to the latest stock market fall has been to inject more money into the financial system, so that banks can keep lending.
In the face of the tumult on Monday last weeek, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) visited one of the nation’s largest and most troubled state-owned steel companies, Taiyuan Iron and Steel Group. There, Li reassured workers, urging them to “revive your strength and power.”
The strategy, though, risks deeper problems down the road.
By not shutting down struggling companies, China is putting off a much-needed shakeout. The nation is also piling on debt to keep such businesses on life support.
That makes it difficult to discern the underlying health of the economy and runs counter to Xi’s tough promise that China would clean up its corporate mess.
Xi also cannot easily ask the central bank to print huge sums of money to bail out the stock market and struggling companies. Doing so now would risk flooding the economy with cash, causing a further decline in China’s currency against the US dollar.
Some economists see ominous signs of a broader slowing.
A quarterly survey of 2,000 Chinese manufacturers and other industrial companies showed that almost none are investing in new equipment and factories.
“In the past four quarters, it is only 2 [percent] to 3 percent that are making expansionary investments,” said Gan Jie (甘潔), director of the Center on Finance and Economic Growth at the Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business in Beijing, who oversees the quarterly survey.
Controlling the currency is already a problem. China has found itself in a difficult position of setting the value of the renminbi lower and lower each day, culminating in a fall of 0.51 percent on Thursday morning alone.
China faces a similar steady drip of stock declines.
China’s stock markets have tended to be less correlated with the local economy than most nations’ markets. That is because trading tends to be a speculative activity in China, mainly undertaken by retail investors, who frequently have a herd instinct.
The problem was on full display last week, as the new circuit breaker mechanism kicked in. The rule imposed a cooling-off period, halting trading for 15 minutes when losses reached 5 percent. After trading resumed, the steep slide continued, prompting the markets to close early twice last week when they reached a second circuit breaker of 7 percent.
To some analysts, it was unnecessary. China has a rule that each stock cannot drop more than 10 percent in a day.
Even China tacitly admitted it had made a mistake. When the nation’s regulator abandoned the policy on Thursday night, it said in a statement that it had imposed the policy despite having “no experience” in using a circuit breaker.
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot
RSS