The ever-increasing demand for the 24-hour illumination of cities is blighting urban residents with two distinct forms of pollution. Current lighting solutions rely on vast amounts of energy, of course, much of which is not yet generated from renewable resources. According to the International Energy Agency, lighting accounts for almost 20 percent of global electricity consumption — and thus high levels of carbon emissions.
However, there is also an increasing acknowledgement that light itself constitutes a form of pollution — and mounting evidence that our exposure to urban lighting at unnatural times is making us ill. It is reported that the glow of Los Angeles is visible to planes 320km away , while in Reykjavik, light pollution is obscuring the northern lights.
With our current lighting technologies being called into question, it is time we considered the numerous alternative lighting solutions being pioneered. Indeed, last year was declared the International Year of Light and Light-based Technologies, in recognition of the critical role that photonics (the science of light particles) now plays in our urban lives and communications.
Illustration: Mountain People
Some of the most interesting plans to tackle the problem of urban light pollution include experiments with phosphorescent trees, light emitting algae, glow-in-the-dark concrete and light scheduling based on big data.
Dutch artist and designer Daan Roosegaarde says we must move into a brave new world of green illumination. After tracing the history of urban lighting from the innocuous and personal candle to light bulbs and increased energy demands, Roosegaarde says the next step is for us to explore bioluminescence.
One Studio Roosegaarde project involves utilizing the luminescent properties of marine bacteria in small plants. While the technology is protected and still being developed, Roosegaarde says that it could be scaled up to provide trees that offer biological alternatives to lampposts.
“Yes we are changing things, but in a way we are doing already on a massive scale,” Roosegaarde said.
In Glasgow, lighting responds to our interactions with the city, as we produce data based on our patterns of movement
Another tantalizing trajectory for Roosegaarde’s “glowing nature project” involves light-emitting algae.
“The algae is beautiful. When you move your hand through the water, it starts to light up. It becomes very responsive, very interactive and that’s something we are pushing. It’s not copper wires and cables; it’s a living thing and you can sense that,” he said.
While the interface is still in development, he said that the algae could be used in lampposts as a way of illuminating our streets.
In response to the potentially harmful influence of these new technologies on the ecosystem, he admits: “There are George Orwell scenarios where we completely damage existing systems.”
It is impossible to predict how new technologies would impact the ecosystem and they might impinge on certain species, causing irreversible damage.
Nevertheless, he contends that “there are also Leonardo da Vinci scenarios” where we discover safer ways to light our cities.
One creative Roosegaarde solution to the unlit bicycle paths in the Dutch town of Nuenen involves using thousands of twinkling stones to create an illuminated route. The Van Gogh path, named after the artist that lived in the town in 1883, blends the traditional with the contemporary in a gesture that points both back to the painting The Starry Night and forward to the innovative future of urban lighting.
South Korean artist Koo Jeong-a has, like Roosegaarde, been involved with the UNESCO Year of Light and was invited this year to build a glow-in-the-dark skatepark in Everton, after Liverpool City Council learned of the success of her previous work with glow-in-the-dark concrete in France. When I asked her about the availability of the material, she told me that since the project took place in France in 2012, it has become a lot easier to procure. While her use of the material is largely concerned with aesthetics, it is not difficult to imagine how the technology might provide solar-powered illumination in more practical urban scenarios.
In Glasgow, an alternative lighting solution has been developed based on big data.
“Glasgow is leading the way with the trial of intelligent street lighting, looking at ways to add more control and efficiency to our lighting network, while harnessing the power of real-time data to improve both lighting and safety throughout the city,” Future Cities said.
The lighting responds to our interactions with the city, as we produce data based on our patterns of movement. This project surely nods toward a more Orwellian future of urban lighting.
Contrary to Glasgow’s pioneering work, Roosegaarde believes that the contemporary obsession with technology is on its way out.
“I think technology will completely disappear and you see that in a way already. It will be there, but less invasive than it is right now. For me, bio is the new digital,” he said.
Whether or not any of these early trajectories for bioluminescent lighting materialize by late this year — the date by which Roosegaarde aims to launch a bigger project — he is opening up a dialogue about how we tackle this endemically urban problem. He argues that there needs to be a radical shift away from fuel-based lighting toward alternative and intuitive lighting.
“Just planting trees and putting grass on roofs is great, but it’s not enough. We need more radical ideas and I’d love to be a pioneer in that,” Roosegaarde said.
For now, though, big data lighting and glow-in-the-dark concrete offer tentative solutions to the problems posed by our cities’ thirst for light.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS