The central bank’s latest cut of its key interest rates by 12.5 basis points for a second consecutive quarter was a surprise to markets, especially when the move came just hours after the US Federal Reserve announced a rate hike of 25 basis points. While the move affirms Taiwan’s departure from the US in terms of monetary policy at a time when there is growing policy divergence among central banks worldwide, it delivers one important message to the general public: Challenges abound on the road ahead.
For the first time in nearly a decade, the Fed last week finally raised its policy rate, saying that future rate hikes would be “gradual,” which means a tilt toward rising capital outflows in Asia. Consequently, the outflows could trigger higher financing costs and downward pressure on Asian currencies across the board.
The Fed move indicates a long-promised step toward the normalization of US monetary policy. In theory, the action should have taken potential rate cuts off the table for Asian central banks in a bid to slow the pace of potential capital outflows. However, that the central bank cut rates within hours of the Fed’s decision underscores not just Taiwanese monetary policymakers’ grave concerns over the economy, but also an implication that the New Taiwan dollar is likely to face more depreciation pressure than its regional peers amid rising exchange rate volatility.
Taiwan’s strong current-account surplus and ample foreign exchange reserves can shield the nation from the risk of a potential outflow contagion in Asia. However, the central bank wanted so badly to emphasize that the economy has yet to fully bottom out, it said a moderate global recovery next year would not be able to drive significant improvement in external demand and consequently slow private investment, as well as consumer spending in Taiwan, according to a statement issued after the bank’s quarterly board meeting on Thursday last week.
Central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) said at a news conference on Thursday that other concerns monetary policymakers hold regarding the nation’s economy include the recent underperformance of export growth; the ongoing regional currency devaluation race; and the economic threats of not participating in bilateral and multilateral trade pacts in Asia.
Nonetheless, managing currency competitiveness seems to be an issue the central bank did not clearly address, but is a crucial tool to beef up the nation’s export growth. Further weakness in the yuan going forward and its spillover impact on other Asian currencies, including the NT dollar, are other unaddressed questions.
Perng suggested that the impact of the rate cuts would take some time to feed through the real economy and interest rate policy should not be too aggressive. However, the bank’s latest move suggests that monetary authorities might have discovered something suspicious on the economic front that the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has not yet factored into last month’s GDP growth forecasts, which predicted the economy could grow 1.06 percent this year and 2.32 percent next year: Things could get worse if other Asian nations, particularly China, get into trouble and drag Taiwan into a further slowdown.
Moreover, there exists a greater uncertainty about next year’s political repercussions in regards to the presidential and legislative elections next month and cross-strait relations afterward.
Any delayed or inappropriate policy response, or even any political development that would negatively surprise investors, could have a bigger impact than an economic slowdown in Asia. With this in mind, the uncertainty is far from over. Instead, more bold actions might be in the central bank’s policy pipeline if things go really wrong.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
Navy Commander Admiral Tang Hua (唐華) said in an interview with The Economist that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been implementing an “anaconda strategy” to subdue Taiwan since President William Lai (賴清德) assumed office. The Chinese military is “slowly, but surely” increasing its presence around Taiwan proper, it quoted Tang as saying. “They are ready to blockade Taiwan at any time they want,” he said. “They give you extreme pressure, pressure, pressure. They’re trying to exhaust you.” Beijing’s goal is to “force Taiwan to make mistakes,” Tang said, adding that they could be “excuses” for a blockade. The interview reminds me
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence