Fifty years ago today, as the American Association for the Advancement of Science highlighted, then-US president Lyndon Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee sent him a report titled Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.
The introduction to the report noted: Pollutants have altered on a global scale the carbon dioxide content of the air and the lead concentrations in ocean waters and human populations.
The report included a section on atmospheric carbon dioxide and climate change, written by prominent climate scientists Roger Revelle, Wallace Broecker, Charles Keeling, Harmon Craig and J. Smagorisnky.
Reviewing the document today, one cannot help but be struck by how well these scientists understood the mechanisms of Earth’s climate change 50 years ago.
The report said that within a few years, climate models would be able to reasonably project future global surface temperature changes.
In 1974, one of its authors, Wallace Broecker, did just that in a paper titled Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?
His model only included the effects of carbon dioxide and his best estimates of natural climate cycles. It did not include the warming effects of other greenhouse gases, or the cooling effects of human aerosol pollution, but fortunately for Broecker, those two effects have roughly canceled each other out over the past 40 years.
Broecker’s model predicted the global warming anticipated by this year both from carbon pollution alone, and when including his best estimate of natural climate cycles. The climate model predictions from more than 40 years ago turned out to be remarkably accurate.
The 1965 report also debunked a number of myths that climate contrarians continue to repeat to this day. For example, the first section of the climate chapter is titled Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuels — the Invisible Pollutant.
Although the US Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant in a landmark 2007 case, many contrarians object to this description. Nevertheless, climate scientists realized a half century ago that human carbon emissions qualify as pollution due to the dangers they pose via climate change.
The report said that although carbon dioxide is an invisible “trace gas” — meaning it comprises a small percentage of the Earth’s atmosphere as a whole — it can nevertheless have significant impacts on the climate at these seemingly low levels.
As the scientists wrote: “Only about one two-thousandth of the atmosphere and one ten-thousandth of the ocean are carbon dioxide. Yet to living creatures, these small fractions are of vital importance Within a few short centuries, we are returning to the air a significant part of the carbon that was slowly extracted by plants and buried in the sediments during half a billion years.”
Contrarians today often repeat the myths that because carbon dioxide is invisible and only a trace gas, it cannot possibly cause significant climate change. This report demonstrates that scientists understood the greenhouse effect better 50 years ago than these contrarians do today.
The report documented the several different lines of evidence that prove the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is entirely human-caused.
“We can conclude with fair assurance that at the present time, fossil fuels are the only source of CO2 being added to the ocean-atmosphere-biosphere system,” the report said.
This is yet another fact understood by climate scientists 50 years ago that some contrarian scientists, such as Roy Spencer and Judith Curry, continue to cast doubt upon to this day.
The report also projected how much the atmospheric carbon dioxide level would increase in the following decades.
Based on projected world energy requirements, the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1956) has estimated an amount of fossil fuel combustion by the year 2000 that with our assumed partitions would give about a 25 percent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, compared with the amount present during the 19th century.
A 25 percent increase from pre-industrial levels would result in about 350 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
The UN underestimated the growth in fossil fuel combustion, because the actual carbon dioxide level in 2000 was 370ppm.
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety of “other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide,” including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea level, warming of sea water, increased acidity of fresh waters (which also applies to the danger of ocean acidification, global warming’s evil twin) and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
These climate scientists warned Johnson in 1965 not just of the dangers associated with human-caused global warming, but also that we might eventually have to consider geoengineering the climate to offset that warming and the risks that we are causing by inadvertently running a dangerous experiment with the Earth’s climate.
Through their worldwide industrial civilization, humanity are unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment. Within a few generations they have been burning the fossil fuels that slowly accumulated in the earth over the past 500 million years.
The climatic changes that may be produced by the increased carbon dioxide content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings. The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored.
Fifty years later, the impending Paris international climate negotiations represent our last chance to heed the expert counsel about the dangers posed by human-caused climate change before we are fully committed to the deleterious consequences that climate scientists have been warning us about for a half century.
That is why more than 1,500 academics from around the world have signed an open letter asking world leaders and delegates at Paris to take vigorous action now to avoid a future of catastrophic global warming.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more
All lives eventually come to an end. Over the years, my friendship with former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had its ups and downs. Lee’s passing was a heavy blow and has left me deeply saddened. We experienced a lot together and the memories have come flooding back. Lee was born several months earlier than me. During World War II, he was studying at Kyoto Imperial University, but halfway through his studies, he was forced to change his name and enter military service. I was studying at Tokyo Imperial University, but went into hiding to avoid military service, and I was later