Pension reform suggestions
Next year there could be a change in the ruling party. Reform of the pension system for public employees — retired military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants — has again become the focus of fierce debate. As a retired member of the military, I would like to offer my humble opinion on the subject.
First, consideration should be given to a clearer differentiation between working and retired people. Under the current system, the difference in the amount paid out to retirees and those actively working is small. Thus, after retirement, many people do nothing but wait for the money to roll in. There is no deterrent to retirement. If the gap between the two were greater — for example canceling the monthly subsidies that retired personnel receive for their children’s education and halting the increases to monthly pension payments in line with current wage adjustments in the job they retired from, or only giving increments up to a certain level — then there would be an incentive for personnel to put off retirement.
Second, currently there is a regulation that public-sector employees who take another public-sector job at “grade one” level after they retire temporarily stop getting their monthly pensions.
I think this should be modified to extend it to the private sector as well. For example, if public-sector retirees have any income up to public-servant grade-one level or the basic wage, then the payment of a monthly pension should be suspended.
I have seen a lot of people retire at the minimum statutory standard. Some even produce strange medical evidence for their retirement. However, as soon as they retire, they seem to undergo a second spring in their career, and take up job opportunities, proving that they are still able to work.
That being the case, suspending their pensions seems reasonable.
Furthermore, government finances are already stretched to their limit, so now is the time for unreasonable measures to be reformed. Such as, paying teachers according to their educational qualifications.
According to the current system, if high-school or elementary-school teachers have a master’s degree or doctorate, they are paid a higher salary. This raises the cost of pensions.
Perhaps in the past there were reasons for the system, but today, access to higher education has increased dramatically, and the case for abolition needs to be reviewed.
The South Korean government has reformed its system so that fewer retirees are able to take pensions at the level of their pre-retirement salaries.
If a nation whose financial situation is so far ahead of Taiwan’s can take such drastic measures, then why do those in power here continue to be shackled by the old system?
They seem to be incapable of thinking outside the box.
Hung Ping-chih
Taipei
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic