Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members, no matter how great or how small, really hate to admit defeat.
It is a trait that they have displayed for more than six decades, starting with the claim that they did not lose the Chinese Civil War, but simply retreated to Taiwan so the Republic of China government could regroup and “reclaim the mainland” one day.
The vainglorious mindset has been on full display this week after the Taipei District Court on Tuesday ordered former minister of finance Christina Liu (劉憶如) to pay Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) compensation for defaming her during the 2102 presidential election campaign.
Liu, who was then head of the Council for Economic Planning and Development, said that Tsai had broken the law with her investment in TaiMed Biologics after she became the firm’s chairperson in late 2007, four months after stepping down as vice premier — and Liu was joined by a Greek chorus of KMT politicians in heaping vituperation upon Tsai, including President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and many KMT lawmakers.
A judicial investigation into the allegations three years ago found no irregularities and now Liu has been found guilty of damaging Tsai’s reputation, yet the KMT acts as if the allegations, which were clearly a political hack job from the start, had merit.
Liu has said she would appeal the ruling, and she and other KMT members have yet to show even a hint of recognition that they were in the wrong.
The Presidential Office tut-tutted that the TaiMed case centered on political integrity and that “someone should clarify whether there had been an issue of failing to avoid conflicts of interest,” a refrain echoed by Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who is to go to court next year to face a similar lawsuit filed by Tsai.
However, the icing on the cake came in comments from KMT lawmakers, with the caucus saying there was still a question of political and moral flaws despite the absence of a judicial ruling, and KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) claiming the only reason Tsai was not “found culpable” was that the nation lacks pertinent regulations — revolving-door laws do not restrict the actions of premiers and vice premiers.
The idea of anyone in the KMT, but especially its caucus — whose lawmakers in the not-so-distant past were known to lobby the government and state-run banks on behalf of businesses they had interests in, and who fought tooth and nail for years against efforts to pass effective sunshine laws — trying to stake out the high ground to lecture about political/moral flaws or holes in sunshine legislation shows what a surreal world Taiwanese politics inhabits.
Even worse, KMT politicos also have yet to admit that their broadsides against Tsai also harmed the nation’s fledgling biotechnology industry — a sector that Ma since his re-election has frequently promoted as part of national industrial development plans.
Prominent scientists and researchers in late 2011 found themselves sucked into the imbroglio surrounding Tsai and TaiMed and investors became leery of putting money into the sector, yet KMT politicians insist that they were and are only concerned with Tsai’s actions. They appear totally ignorant of the collateral damage the nation suffered from their antics and continue to demand that Tsai apologize for her actions, even though she did nothing that legally merits an apology.
Wu this week said that a person afraid of making apologies “is not qualified to run for president.”
Despite the many KMT politicians who have resigned — or were pushed — from their posts over the years to take responsibility for policy failures, the party has an abject fear of admitting its errors. That is why many Taiwanese dream of expanding Wu’s concept into one that states “a party that cannot apologize is not qualified to run a nation.”
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press