With Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) US visit over, Taiwan needs to be concerned about whether he sought any promises from Washington on exerting pressure on Taiwanese political leaders on cross-strait issues.
Beijing has repeatedly pulled strings with its allies whenever there was a presidential election in Taiwan. This behavior suggests China is limited to the political experience of its own system in its relations with Taiwan. If it wants to deal with a post-democratization Taiwan, the only way it can improve cross-strait relations is for it to change its mindset.
During the Martial Law period under former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the president’s decision on how cross-strait relations were to be defined was final.
However, after the nation democratized, the rules of the game changed: The country must now be run according to constitutional and democratic processes. Irrespective of who is president, the way cross-strait relations are to be defined is a government-level issue: Not just the business of the president, but also of the legislature and the public, where the public should have the last say. Both the president and the legislature have to obey the decisions of the public via the mechanism of constitutional government.
Under China’s authoritarian system, whatever the president says, goes. If the leadership were to apply this approach in Taiwan, it would naturally place its expectations on assurances from Taiwan’s political leaders.
However, in contrast with China’s authoritarian system — in which decisions are made top-down — decisionmaking in a democracy is bottom-up, so Beijing is missing the point by placing its hopes in assurances from Taiwan’s political leadership regarding cross-strait relations. Threatening to change the “status quo” in cross-strait exchanges will serve only to increase the distance between Beijing and Taiwanese, and ultimately achieve the opposite of what it wants to achieve.
China has suffered at the hands of imperialism and Taiwan has long been on the wrong side of colonialism. China should be able to sympathize with Taiwan in its current predicament. Indeed, from ancient times China has had something that reverberates with modern ideas of democracy: wangdao (王道, “benevolent rule” or the “kingly way”). Imperialism is about forcing people into submission; it is badao (霸道, the “way of the hegemon”). The kingly way is persuading people through virtue to follow you. In today’s language, this would be acting according to the public will.
If China can change its domestic politics, move toward democracy, and promote goodwill and friendly exchanges between Taiwan and China, it might initiate an authentic resurgence of the Chinese-speaking world, with the mindset of the kingly way, of benevolent rule. If it tries to intimidate Taiwan with the way of the hegemon, then it would be little different from the imperialists that it itself suffered from for so long, and it would turn Taiwanese against it. This would not be any good for favorable development of cross-strait relations.
Cross-strait issues should be decided by the public and whether a politician accepts this practice should be a crucial factor in assessing them.
In the long term, irrespective of how cross-strait relations develop, China should think long and hard about whether it wants to deal with an amenable Taiwan or a hostile one. To that end, a good start would be to remove the missiles pointed at Taiwan as a show of goodwill. One would think that it would have an impact on public opinion.
Ho Hsin-chuan is a professor in National Chengchi University’s philosophy department.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold