On Wednesday, a day before the central bank’s quarterly board meeting, Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) told members of the legislature’s Finance Committee that Taiwan had no need for quantitative easing and the bank’s monetary policy was loose enough to support economic growth. However, the next day, the bank announced it was cutting its key policy rates by 12.5 basis points.
It was the central bank’s first rate cut after keeping them — the discount rate, the rate on accommodations with collateral and the rate on accommodations without collateral — unchanged for 16 quarters. With GDP growth revised down to 1.56 percent for this year and the nation’s real interest rates the second-highest in the region, the bank said it expected its modest rate cut to bolster the economy.
Even though the rate cut was slight, the abrupt policy turnaround not only highlights how badly the export-reliant economy is being hammered by the economic slowdown, but also suggests that the nation might be entering a rate-cut cycle if the widening domestic output gap and the deterioration in external demand conditions remain unchanged in the coming months.
It was a bold move at a time when economic growth had slowed to its lowest level since the global financial crisis in 2008 and 2009. The central bank aims to prevent the economy from being thrown into a recession caused by sluggish exports and a housing market meltdown, as it believes lower rates would encourage consumers and businesses to increase spending and investments, which would help revitalize economic activity.
However, the rate cut, while boosting public confidence in the short term, will not solve problems in the ailing housing market, which are still expected to drag well into next year.
The housing market is suffering from the worst slump in more than a decade, with sales continuing to fall. It will take time for construction companies to get rid of the oversupply of unsold homes, meaning that the slump will continue to hold back the economy, and probably lead to more job cuts in construction, manufacturing and other industries.
Affordability is still an issue for would-be home buyers, as housing prices have not dropped significantly while wages have been stagnant for more than a decade. However, legitimate concern about whether prices will stop falling because of the rate cut remains.
In the short term, the rate cut can provide a psychological boost to exporters, as the central bank’s move will allow the New Taiwan dollar’s weakness to extend into next quarter — and likely beyond — to help boost the competitiveness of Taiwanese exporters.
However, there are doubts as to whether the rate cut is simply a symbolic move or whether it can deliver effective results in the long run.
Liquidity in Taiwan has been persistently abundant in the financial sector, thanks to excessive savings and insufficient investment opportunities in the domestic market. In other words, it is not the supply side, but the demand side that has been causing problems in the economy. With mild recovery in developed economies and a further downturn in China, it is natural that deteriorating external demand would continue to adversely affect domestic investment and private consumption. It has to be questioned whether domestic demand could be energized merely by managing currency competitiveness and lowering funding costs.
The government needs to adopt other policies to foster growth. Agencies other than the central bank must move quickly to fight recession by implementing expansionary fiscal policy and structural reforms. The issue is certain to gain even more attention as the nation’s economy becomes a highly debated topic ahead of the presidential election in January.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which