What an extraordinary week. After years of poor displaced people always being “migrants” and never “refugees,” of the UK’s elected representatives calling them “swarms” and our professional trolls calling them “cockroaches,” only a few months after 4 million voted for a party whose only real principle is “never let them in,” a sudden geyser of compassion has erupted.
People making runs to Calais, France, are swamped with donations. People who set up fundraising pages are exceeding their targets 10 times over. And it is coming from all sectors of society: A mate whose house is serving as the local drop-off center is having his bell rung at all hours by middle-class parents, builders’ merchants, mechanics and even homeless people. It is brilliant, baffling and profoundly important.
It is far too early to call this a turning point, but the compassion explosion is compelling because it goes against all the dominant themes of modern politics. It stands in stark contrast to the Iraq war, probably the single most depoliticizing event of the 21st century, when 2 million people learned that it does not matter what you do, your government will ignore you anyway. This is the diametric opposite: Popular pressure has forced British Prime Minister David Cameron’s bitter and vindictive outfit to climb down and admit 20,000 people — a pitiful number compared with Germany’s 800,000 and not a single one from the survivors of the traumatic journey to Europe, but 20,000 more than they wanted to let in. If we keep pressing, that can be just the start. The key to it has been shaming our leaders through our own actions, not waiting for them to do the right thing, but showing them how to.
Iillustration: Mountain People
That return of agency, of individual and collective power to act, is a notable corrective to the second dominant theme of 21st-century politics: the insistence that we must comply with whatever markets dictate, that we are basically powerless to change the way we live. It is that sense of “what can we do?” that holds us back from even trying to make the world a better place.
However, when we do act, in whatever small way, the sense of joy and fulfillment that comes from connecting with others and making a difference gives us a whole new sense of who we are and what we are capable of.
Most of all, action connects us to other human beings, an ever more critical need as we live more and more of our lives virtually and online. When we drive a van full of supplies to Calais, or volunteer in a refugee center, or open our homes to exhausted families for a few days, we meet these strange and alien creatures we have been repeatedly taught to fear — and we find that they are funny, or interesting, or annoying, or all those things at once. In other words, that they are just like us. We expand our sense of who we are and of who other people are, and that is brilliant for both sides.
Overcoming the fear of others that has been drummed into us is probably the most radical thing we can do right now. Even more than contemptuous government or market dictatorship, post-Sept. 11, 2001, politics has been based on fear. Our elites cleverly manipulate the insecurity caused by their own capitalism, its ripping away of our safety nets and its destabilizing of our jobs and turn it into a fear of boundless terror attacks and hordes of grasping dusky migrants.
However, that fear can only be sustained by distance, by keeping people at arm’s length. Once you meet your fears, share a room or a cup of tea with them, they melt away.
Where will it go, the compassion explosion? Will it melt away as the photo of Alan Kurdi fades in our memories? It is completely possible, of course.
However, my bet is that the genie is out of the bottle. My bet is that as people rediscover the intoxicating sensation of actually being able to do something in real life instead of whining about it on the Internet, they will want more of it. (Some of them will take real-life action against migrants, not for them — let us not be fooled by our Facebook pages; not everyone feels compassion right now. But that is what makes democracy interesting.) And my bet is that as we realize that this refugee “crisis” is no crisis, but the new normal, we will start to think about what is causing people to move across the Earth in such huge numbers.
That is the next phase: to look at the causes of migration. Climate change. Western military intervention. The depredations of development banks and corporations. Propping up dodgy dictators in the name of stability. These are harder to fix than delivering bedrolls, but the key to it is to realize that Western elites are intimately responsible for all of them, using our money, and thus if anyone can do something, we can.
Even now Cameron is planning to use the suffering of Syrians to justify bombing Syria and killing more Alan Kurdis. If we do not connect the dots and begin to stop our elites doing the things that cause migration, we betray the millions of people who are not refugees yet, but assuredly will be.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS