Party politics in Taiwan is a strange affair. The offices of the president, the premier and the opposition leaders are less than a kilometer apart, but for many years, they have treated each other as enemies and communicated only via the media, avoiding any kind of interpersonal interaction. This kind of “cold war” politics is making it difficult for Taiwan to move forward.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has said that if she can adjust her schedule, she will attend the Double Ten National Day celebrations this year.
This is a show of good will that could lead to political conciliation, but instead, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) has questioned Tsai’s absence from previous National Day celebrations and KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) has ridiculed Tsai, asking if she will be carrying the national flag every day from now on.
Attendance at the National Day celebrations is a political issue. During former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration, pan-blue legislators, including Hung, boycotted the celebrations en masse. When she did attend in 2006, the year of the “red shirt” campaign attempting to unseat Chen, she did so dressed in red to show her support for the campaign.
After President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was elected, the DPP chairperson has been absent from the celebrations, so Tsai’s decision to attend the event with DPP legislators is of course based on political considerations: With big hopes of winning next year’s elections, the party’s willingness to attend National Day celebrations is an expression of their hopes of being able to create an atmosphere conducive to party conciliation.
When former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) first met with Chen following the transfer of power in 2000, he asked Chen to carefully consider the nuclear power issue, but as Lien left the Presidential Office, the DPP Cabinet announced that it would halt construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City. Lien felt that the Chen administration had humiliated him and after that day, the KMT resorted to boycotting and blocking the Chen administration at every turn and obstructing its governance.
The cold war between the KMT and the opposition has continued after Ma was elected president and there was a complete lack of interaction between party leaders, until then-DPP chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) asked for a meeting with Ma in connection with long-term political activist Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) hunger strike aimed at forcing a halt to the construction of the Gongliao nuclear power plant.
The result was that it would have been better not to have had a meeting at all and as a resigned DPP gave up all hope of dialogue, the political deadlock continued.
The symbolic significance of the opposition leaders attending the National Day celebrations outweighs any practical significance, but conflict and mutual grudges will not go away just because Ma and Tsai meet and shake hands at the ceremony.
However, that politicians are willing to initiate a thaw in relations will benefit the functioning of party politics, political operations and thus overall national development; therefore such gestures should be encouraged.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS