The Chinese stock market has been in freefall for several days and more than half of the listed companies have suspended trading in their stock. By Tuesday, the market had lost US$6.5 trillion in value, 17 times Greece’s GDP, and it is still falling. Rather than the Greek financial crisis, it is the Chinese stock market disaster that poses the biggest economic threat to the world.
What has caused this fall? The Chinese economy has experienced high growth for several years, and as the People’s Bank of China has lowered interest rates and relaxed capital controls, a capital bubble has formed. When the growth rate slows, there will be an unstoppable chain effect. The Chinese government is trying to save the market through intervention, and the central bank has lowered interest rates, the reserve requirement ratio and the reverse repo rate, all to no avail.
China’s Securities and Futures Commission last weekend issued repeated signals that it would rescue the market, and 21 securities firms entered the market in a net asset position, but investors saw through the government’s attempt to save the market and took advantage of the situation, making a profit and then pulling out, and the market continued to fall. There is now a risk that a capital outflow crisis could lead to a financial crisis.
China’s economic system is affected by its opaque political system, and there is a lack of public trust. The Chinese economy is not doing as well as it used to, but it is still not doing too badly. Despite that, a wealth of conspiracy theories have caused public trust to collapse.
China’s has always been a centrally planned economy, and the government has always manipulated the market. The scale of the market has now expanded and market factors have become more complex, with the result that government intervention is not as astute as it was. The government sees the fortunes of the stock market as its own responsibility and thinks it can turn the tide on its own, but the government is clearly incapable of outsmarting the market.
The Chinese economy’s slowing growth rate is an unavoidable trend. Beijing forecast a growth rate for this year of 7 percent and has said that the growth rate will drop to 5 percent within 10 years. This period of falling growth will be accompanied by adaptation and the creation of a legal framework formalizing the economic system and deregulation measures, but the government still lags behind and if the slowing growth gets out of control, the economic slowdown will be even more precipitous.
Taiwan is the nation that is most economically dependent on China in the world today, and the Chinese stock market disaster will have a direct impact on Taiwanese investments in China. The damage to the Chinese market will also have a massive impact on Taiwanese imports and exports. As the Chinese economy sickens, the global economy will catch a cold, but the Taiwanese economy will catch a fever.
Taiwan has long been dependent on China’s development and neglected its international expansion. Now that China itself is alert to its slowing domestic economy and is turning to its “one belt, one road” strategy to create a wider regional market, there is even less reason for Taiwan to place all its eggs in the Chinese basket. The Chinese stock market disaster is a crisis, but it also offers Taiwan a good opportunity to increase its efforts to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other international trade frameworks.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,