Bottlenose dolphins have an average brain mass of 1.6kg, slightly greater than that of human brains and about four times the size of chimpanzee brains.
Although you could not really imagine a dolphin writing poetry, dolphins demonstrate high levels of intelligence and social behavior. For example, they display mirror self-recognition, as well as an understanding of symbol-based communication systems.
Research into the differing brain sizes and intellectual capabilities within the animal kingdom is fascinating.
Why have some species evolved to be more intelligent than others? Does brain size affect cognitive ability?
Some studies say yes, but some insist otherwise. It really depends which species you are talking about.
In humans, for example, larger brains do not indicate higher intelligence — otherwise Einstein, who had an average-sized brain, might have not been quite as successful in his career. A 23-page analysis of Einstein’s brain is available online that makes for great bedtime reading.
Most neuroscientists now believe that it is the structure of the brain on a cellular and molecular level that determines its computational capacity.
However, within certain animal species, a larger brain offers an evolutionary advantage. For example, large-brained female guppies are better survivors and demonstrate greater cognitive strengths than their smaller-brained counterparts.
Although the relationship between brain size and cognitive abilities of vertebrates has been widely studied, the mechanisms underlying how many species have evolved larger brains have proven difficult to decipher.
A group of evolutionary biologists from University College London, Stockholm University and the University of Helsinki set out to explore this unknown, aiming to determine the genetic architecture underlying the evolution of brain size variation in guppies and zebra fish.
Why did the researchers choose zebra fish and guppies? Well, these fish species make good model organisms for neural development because their genetic makeup, as well as the genetic pathways controlling their development, are highly similar to those of humans.
Although the brain structure of the zebra fish does differ from the human brain in certain regions, their overall organization is also similar. Guppies, a species of freshwater aquarium fish, are often used in research because of their short life span and therefore short generation time, in addition to their ease of breeding and high reproductive capacity.
The researchers carried out their experiment to mimic evolutionary change in fish over a short period of time. First, they selectively bred guppies to have either small or large brains, creating a 9 percent difference in brain size between two groups of fish. This variation saw significant distinctions in cognitive abilities between the two fish populations.
Then, to identify the genes underlying these differences in brain size, the researchers did a full genome expression analysis of the large and small-brained guppies. They found one gene that stood out — angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) expression was much greater in the larger-brained guppies.
Ang-1 is not a gene that is typically studied for its contribution toward determining brain size. However, the protein encoded by Ang-1 is known for its importance in the development of blood vessels — angiogenesis — in humans.
Ang-1 has also been found to play a role in the growth and development of neurons — making it a potential key player in the shaping of brain size and cognitive evolution in vertebrates.
To explore the significance of Ang-1 in brain size variation, the researchers next did “knockout” experiments in zebra fish embryos. They deleted the expression of Ang-1 in zebra fish and then looked for any effects on brain size. Interestingly, the knockout caused morphant zebra fish to have significantly smaller brains than those of the controls.
That a single gene can have such an effect on brain growth suggests that the genetic architecture affecting brain size may be much simpler than anticipated.
One of the authors, Judith Mank from University College London Biosciences, said: “We were surprised to see that only a single gene was up-regulated in the large-brained guppies. Given the complexity of the brain, we expected that the genetics would be very intricate, but this suggests that changes in brain size are underpinned by relatively simple genetic mechanisms.”
Mank and her coworkers propose that Ang-1 is a key gene underlying evolutionary changes in vertebrate brain size and cognitive abilities. However, there are still many questions to answer. For example, does modifying Ang-1 expression directly alter brain size via neural growth, or indirectly through stimulating angiogenesis?
Larger-brained guppies might have a higher expression of Ang-1 because they need more blood vessels to ensure an adequate blood supply for these big brains. This may also be why zebra fish Ang-1 morphants grew smaller brains — the fish could not grow enough blood vessels to sustain such a large brain.
Future studies focusing on the pathways that Ang-1 stimulates will be needed to gain a better understanding into this brain growth gene’s mechanism of action.
This study represents quite a swim toward outlining the growth patterns characterizing fish brain-volution — as I like to call it. The authors are now interested in how modifying Ang-1 levels affects other aspects of a fish’s lifetime.
Future experiments investigating Ang-1 in different species are expected to help determine whether this role of Ang-1 extends to other species, including its relevance to human brain development.
Sharon Darwish is a writer and neuroscience graduate.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which