From open-top bus tours and neighborhood rallies to bicycle protests and dance routines, campaigners in Hong Kong are employing a range of tactics to win hearts and minds ahead of a key vote on the territory’s political future.
However, for many residents, the canvassing and rhetoric is starting to wear thin as they accuse politicians of losing touch with the issues that affect their daily lives.
The territory’s government says its proposal to hold the first public vote to elect a leader — currently chosen by a pro-Beijing committee — is a step forward for democracy.
Opposition legislators and activists, however, reject the motion for 2017 as “fake democracy” as it sticks to Beijing’s ruling that candidates must be vetted by a loyalist committee.
That decision sparked mass student-led street rallies that shut down parts of the financial hub for more than two months late last year in what is known as the Umbrella movement.
Pro-democracy lawmakers make up more than a third of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council and have vowed to block the proposal, which needs a two-thirds majority to pass. The vote is expected to take place in June.
Campaigners from both camps are eager to show that they have popular support.
In recent weeks, senior government politicians have toured neighborhoods in open-top buses and are dropping in to deliver their “Make It Happen” message.
A campaign speech by Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) saw a group of middle-aged women dance a choreographed routine to popular Chinese tune Little Apple. A pro-government singer even delivered an off-key rendition of Under a Vast Sky by Hong Kong band Beyond, traditionally a pro-democracy anthem.
Elsewhere on the streets, pro-government group Alliance for Peace and Democracy (APD) said it had gathered 1.2 million signatures supporting the election plan.
“Hong Kong can choose between universal suffrage, having an election and voting for their own chief executive in peace, or they can decide to reject it and...bring chaos to Hong Kong,” APD spokesman Robert Chow (周融) said.
Pro-democracy campaigners have also toured local neighborhoods on trucks and protesters with yellow umbrellas — symbol of the democracy movement — regularly interrupt official events and campaign speeches.
Pan-democrat legislators bicycled through some of the territory’s most densely populated working class areas to deliver their message.
“We need to make use of every minute before the vote to remind Hong Kong people why you would end up worse off by pocketing the government proposal,” Civic Party leader Alan Leong (梁家傑) said.
“We don’t want our vote to be used as a way to legitimize an electoral model that does not give Hong Kong people real choice,” he said.
A rolling poll by three leading universities shows that the public is split.
The latest figures, based on a survey of more than 1,100 people, show 46 percent oppose the government’s plan while 39 percent support it, with 15 percent undecided.
While there are vocal supporters on both sides, many feel alienated by the political tug of war.
“I don’t support either side. Both sides are too extreme,” student Patricia Lam said.
“It’s a waste of time as there is no consensus at all,” she said.
Housewife Yu Lai-mui, 59, said rising rail fares and building a better airport were more important.
“The Occupy movement was too radical,” she said, referring to one of the most vocal groups involved in the months of protest at the end of 2014.
“I didn’t support it. On the other hand, even if the political reform is passed, I don’t see how it can bring advantage to people’s livelihoods,” she said.
In a territory with a widen/bing wealth gap and soaring housing costs, some say they are simply concerned with survival.
For 94-year-old Mok, telephone calls from political campaigners are a nuisance.
“I have hung up on them. At my age, I just care about my two meals a day,” he said.
“I work 18 hours a day. I don’t have time to care. Even if I do, what difference can I make?” 50-year-old construction worker Law said.
Although the pro-democracy movement has fragmented, there are still small-scale protests in busy Mong Kok, which saw some of the most violent clashes during last year’s rallies.
However with no government concessions to date, residents fear that taking to the streets will have little impact.
“Sometimes they take over space around you and start shouting. I don’t see the point. I am quite fed up and feel powerless. I think a lot of Hong Kong people feel the same,” local phone service vendor Cheung said.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
The scuffle between Chinese embassy staffers in Fiji and a Taiwanese diplomat at a Republic of China (ROC) Double Ten National Day celebration has turned into a public relations opportunity for the government, Beijing and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Although the incident occurred on Oct. 8, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) downplayed it, only for the story to be picked up by the foreign media, forcing the ministry to respond. The public and opposition parties asked why the government had failed to remonstrate more strongly in the first instance. It is still unclear whether the ministry missed a trick
US President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former US vice president Joe Biden, are holding their final debate tonight. In their foreign policy debate, China is sure to be a major issue of contention for the two candidates. Here are several questions the moderator should pose to the candidates: For both: In the first televised US presidential debates in 1960, then-Democratic candidate John F. Kennedy and his Republican counterpart, Richard Nixon, were asked whether the US should intervene if communist China attacked Taiwan’s outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu. Kennedy said no, unless the main island of Taiwan was also attacked.
For most of us, the colorful, otherworldly marinescapes of coral reefs are as remote as the alien landscapes of the moon. We rarely, if ever, experience these underwater wonderlands for ourselves — we are, after all, air-breathing, terrestrial creatures mostly cocooned in cities. It is easy not to notice the perilous state they are in: We have lost 50 percent of coral reefs in the past 20 years and more than 90 percent are expected to die by 2050, a presentation at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Diego, California, earlier this year showed. As the oceans heat further and