Tue, Apr 28, 2015 page9

• UK election results threaten EU stability and global security

  • By Andrew Hammond
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The UK General Election is to be held on Thursday next week, the first since 2010. The ballot is the most uncertain in at least two decades, with five parties in England (six in Scotland) polling more than 5 percent of the vote for the first time in modern UK political history.

  While the election has received significant attention for its potential impact on domestic policy, it could also have key implications for longstanding tenets of post-war UK foreign policy. This includes potential “fast-track exit” from the EU, adding to wider European disintegration woes given the possibility of Greece’s departure from the eurozone this year.

  Moreover, there is intensified debate over renewal of Britain’s independent nuclear arsenal at a time when there are growing warnings about a more assertive Russia. This important decision, to be made next year with a price tag of at least ￡25 billion (US$37.9 billion), is opposed by numerous minor parties which could end up sharing power in a post-election pact.

  For, in the midst of all the electoral uncertainty, a second consecutive “hung parliament” — in which no one party wins a majority of seats, appears likely. This would be unprecedented in modern UK political history, and might result in a second consecutive coalition government in London — potentially this time comprised of a patchwork of more than two parties.

  This is because it could require more than two parties to secure a majority of the 650 seats in the House of Commons. That is, unless the Labour and Conservative parties were to join in a so-called National Government — last seen during World War II.

  A second possibility is that the party which wins the largest number of seats would run a minority government. Such an administration could potentially function through a so-called “confidence and supply” arrangement whereby one or more other parties agree to support the government in motions of confidence and potentially budget/appropriation votes by voting in favor, or abstaining.

  Given the potential need for multiparty pacts in either scenario, politicians are jockeying with each other about their price for a deal. For instance, the UK Independence Party (UKIP), which is a party built around a policy of British exit from the EU, won its first two seats in parliament last year, and has pledged to potentially support the Conservatives if the latter agrees to a fast-track “in-out” referendum, potentially in the second half of this year.

  British Prime Minister David Cameron said in January that he would be “delighted” to hold such a fast-track plebiscite on membership of the EU which Britain first joined in 1973. His comments make the possibility of a Conservative-UKIP pact increasingly possible, and a speedy EU referendum with it. With polls showing the British population broadly split on the question of being in or out of the EU, the prospect of exit — so-called “Brexit” — is therefore real.

  As well as the significant economic damage this could result in, Brexit would also have a profound impact upon the EU. This includes disrupting the 28 member state’s balance of power, inner workings, policy orientations and international standing.

  Another example of where there is renewed debate over a longstanding tenet of UK foreign policy concerns the Trident independent nuclear deterrence. For instance, Plaid Cymru, the Welsh national party, and the Greens which currently have three and one members of parliament respectively, are open to an electoral arrangement with Labour but will only do so on the basis that the latter reverses its current policy pledge to renew Trident.

  Previously, the Scottish National Party (SNP), which currently has six MPs but polls indicate could win many more next month, had also insisted on this condition as a requirement for supporting Labour too. However, SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon declared last month that her party had changed tack and would potentially support Labour, on a case-by-case basis, in a supply and confidence arrangement without a deal on Trident.

  Since 1998, Trident has been the only operational nuclear weapons program in UK service. Britain has long had a nuclear arsenal after becoming the third country, behind the US and the former Soviet Union, to independently test a weapon in 1952, and is currently one of five nuclear weapons states under the Non-Proliferation Treaty alongside China and France too.

  Inevitably, this issue is of key interest to UK allies, including the US. The debate comes in the context of remarks this year from US Army Chief of Staff General Raymond Odierno saying he is “very concerned” about the impact of spending cuts on the UK’s international military capability.

  Another post-election possibility that might have international ramifications could follow from a Conservative pact with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), which currently holds eight seats in the House of Commons. The DUP would probably want more powers and financing for Northern Ireland as a price for such a pact. Northern Ireland’s nationalist parties, however, would potentially be concerned that such an electoral understanding could result in concessions that jeopardize the Northern Irish peace process.

  Looking forward to Thursday next week, in the event of a second consecutive hung parliament, the precise parliamentary arithmetic would help decide whether there is a coalition or minority government. The closer either the Conservatives or Labour get to 326 of the total 650 seats in the House of Commons, the more likely a minority administration might become.

  However, whether coalition or minority government, another hung parliament could have key foreign policy implications for Britain and its allies, including injecting new uncertainty into the debate over renewal of Trident, and the UK’s membership of the EU — two key planks of British foreign policy for decades.

  Andrew Hammond is an associate at LSE IDEAS (the Centre for International Affairs, Diplomacy and Strategy) at the London School of Economics.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Referendum, 26 recall votes could cost NT$1.62 billion

  • 2

    Conference on rebuilding Ukraine opens in Italy

  • 3

    MOFA welcomes remarks by NATO’s Rutte

  • 4

    Dispute between US, Brazil escalates

  • 5

    TSMC’s materials executive quits