On April 22, the world marked the 45th anniversary of Earth Day, established in 1970 to draw attention to environmental challenges. Never have those challenges been greater or more urgent than they are today. The combination of climate change, erosion of biodiversity and depletion of natural resources is propelling the planet toward a tipping point, beyond which objectives like sustainable development and poverty reduction will be more difficult than ever to achieve.
Since 1970, scientists have learned not only that human activity is the primary driver of environmental change on Earth, but also that it is pushing the planet beyond its natural limits. If we do not make big changes fast, the results could be devastating.
Global leaders seemed to recognize this when they agreed five years ago to limit global warming during this century to 2°C above pre-industrial levels — the threshold beyond which we risk triggering more devastating consequences of climate change. However, strong action to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions has not been taken. On the contrary, emissions have increased markedly; as a consequence, last year was the hottest year on record.
The world is now on track to deplete its remaining “budget” for carbon dioxide emissions, which now amounts to less than 907.2 billion tonnes, in just 25 years. The result would be catastrophic changes like unmanageable sea-level rises, devastating heat waves and persistent droughts that create unprecedented challenges in terms of food security, ecosystems, health and infrastructure. Unsurprisingly, the poorest and most vulnerable will be the hardest hit.
We must change course. Earth Day should serve as a reminder — and, indeed, a catalyst — of what the world really needs: strong and sustained action. Fortunately, this year may mark the beginning of just such a change for the better.
This year, world leaders will meet three times to chart a new path for our planet. In July, they will meet in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the Conference on Financing for Development. In September, they will convene to approve the Sustainable Development Goals, which will guide development efforts until 2030. And in December, they will head to Paris to negotiate a new global climate agreement.
The outcomes of these meetings will shape this generation’s legacy for the natural environment and economic growth and development. By decarbonizing the global economy and limiting climate change, world leaders can unleash a wave of innovation, support the emergence of new industries and jobs and generate vast economic opportunities.
It is up to all of us to encourage political leaders to do what is needed to secure such an outcome. Just as we demand that our governments address risks associated with terrorism or epidemics, we should put concerted pressure on them to act now to preserve our natural environment and curb climate change.
Here, the scientific community has a special responsibility to share their research and its potential implications. That is why I and the 16 other scientists of the Earth League — representing world-leading academic institutions like the Potsdam Institute on Climate Impact Research, the Earth Institute, Tsinghua University and the Stockholm Resilience Centre — have released the “Earth Statement,” which sets out the eight essential elements of a successful global climate deal, to be reached in Paris in December:
‧ First, the agreement must reinforce countries’ commitment to limit global warming to below 2°C.
‧ Second, the agreement needs to recognize the remaining global budget for carbon dioxide emissions.
‧ Third, the agreement should lay the foundation for a fundamental transformation of the economy, with deep decarbonization beginning immediately, in order to create a zero-carbon society by about 2050.
‧ Fourth, all 196 countries in the UN Climate Convention must formulate an emissions pathway consistent with deep decarbonization, with richer countries taking the lead.
‧ Fifth, countries must promote innovation in clean technologies and ensure universal access to existing technological solutions.
‧ Sixth, governments must agree to support adaptation to climate change and to address the loss and damage associated with it.
‧ Seventh, the agreement must include provisions to safeguard carbon sinks and vital ecosystems.
‧ Eighth, to help developing countries fight climate change, donors need to provide additional support at a level at least comparable to current global development aid.
The good news is that these eight objectives are realistic and achievable; indeed, some progress is already being made. Last year, total carbon dioxide emissions from the energy sector remained unchanged year on year for the first time (in the absence of an economic downturn). And recent reports show that emissions in China, the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, also did not increase from 2013 to last year.
The tide is turning. Decarbonization has already begun, and the appeal of a fossil-fuel-free world is growing — not only because it would limit climate change, but also because it would be more technologically advanced, democratic, resilient, healthy and economically dynamic. This is the right time to move fully onto a more sustainable, zero-carbon path.
With the right global deal, the world could finally do just that. For the sake of the planet, and the people who depend on it, let us make this year Earth Year.
Johan Rockstrom is professor of global sustainability at Stockholm University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on