Tsai’s cross-strait outlook
Wednesday last week marked the first anniversary of the Sunflower movement. Taiwanese youth keep driving their energy toward social involvement and constitutional reform. The fundamental difference between younger Taiwanese and older generations is their sense of national identity. While some of the older generation still consider Taiwan to be part of China, most young people believe Taiwan is their nation — they hold a cross-section of blue and green beliefs — and Taiwan is their home.
That is why last year, then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) instructing KMT legislators to pass the cross-strait service trade agreement with China spawned the movement.
Ma believes that Taiwan is part of China — the Republic of China (ROC).
He has always said that Japan returned Taiwan’s sovereignty to the ROC under the Treaty of Taipei and that the ROC is the government that represents China — including the mainland and Mongolia.
Unfortunately, that is not true and history does not favor Ma’s interpretation.
In November last year, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) benefited from the Sunflower movement by winning the local elections in a landslide. Now, political attention is focused on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). How will she interpret cross-strait relations? What are her thoughts on Taiwan’s “status quo”?
On March 4, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) attended the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference meeting, which emphasized that the so-called “1992 consensus” is the foundation of cross-strait political mutual trust.
As we know, the “1992 consensus” was made up by Su Chi (蘇起) in 2000, then minister of the Mainland Affairs Council, eight years after the 1992 Koo-Wang meetings between former Straits Exchange Foundation chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫) and China’s former Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits chairman Wang Daohan (汪道涵).
The “consensus” binds the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) into “one China” and both of them agree Taiwan is part of “China.”
However, there is another “one China” policy in which the US says that the PRC represents the whole of China and that Taiwan is not part of the ROC or the PRC under the three communiques and the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
On Friday last week, former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) managing director Barbara Schrage attended a conference on Taiwan-US relations in Washington hosted by the Heritage Foundation, where she questioned Tsai’s plan for dealing with cross-strait issues.
Schrage said that Tsai’s presentation in 2012 was very disappointing.
Schrage’s critics referred to a fundamental issue of Taiwan’s status: Is Taiwan a nation? Yes, and the majority of Taiwanese insist that it is.
Is Taiwan a nation with sovereignty? No. That is why Taiwan has been denied membership in the UN.
Taiwan does not even have an official name and Constitution — how can it be recognized as a sovereign nation?
The ROC is not a recognized nation with sovereignty; it is only an exiled government kicked out by the PRC.
How can Tsai make her Washington visit successful this time?
She is a professional negotiator. She has the knowledge and wisdom to handle any sharp questions, if she just remembers the following: The US does not recognize the ROC under the TRA. Neither the ROC nor the PRC has sovereignty over Taiwan. Taiwan is more or less like East Timor or Cuba. Popular sovereignty is not equal to territorial sovereignty.
The Taiwan Relations Act and the San Francisco Peace Treaty are must-read documents for Tsai before her trip; I believe she will have a very pleasant and successful trip to the US.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if