The most common criticism leveled at President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) during his seven years in office is that he relies only on a small circle of confidants — who all think the same.
They are all very close and live in their own world, enjoying preferential treatment and distanced from the outside world, which means that there is an increasing distance between them and the general public on the one hand and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on the other.
The Presidential Office recently announced that former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and former Presidential Office secretary-general Timothy Yang (楊進添) have been appointed senior presidential advisers. In addition, former Presidential Office spokesperson Fan Chiang Tai-chi (范姜泰基) is about to become chairman of Chun Pin Enterprise Co and former Hsinchu mayor Hsu Ming-tsai (許明財) is to become chairman of Global Energy Maritime Co — both of whom have been appointed by state-run parent company, CPC Corp, Taiwan.
Meanwhile, former Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏) was last month appointed chairman of one of Taiwan Power Co’s units.
Officials serve the public, and when their time in office is up, they become ordinary citizens, living their own lives without any special treatment and without lifelong guarantees. However, Ma’s advisers are found well-paid sinecures.
One can only wonder why the international community is not paying attention to Ma’s concern for his underlings.
Every corporate chairman appointed by the Ma administration shares the same distinguishing feature: They have no connection to the company, industry or field of expertise to which they are appointed. It is purely a matter of political rewards.
Even more interesting, the government has practical control over these companies, even though its shareholdings are less than 50 percent, allowing it to avoid supervision as a public enterprise.
Minister of Economic Affairs John Deng’s (鄧振中) explanation for the appointments is that Hsu served as director of Hsinchu’s Department of Labor Affairs and thus has the ability to promote harmonious labor relations, while Fan Chiang studied business management. Following this logic, Shen will presumably be better than most at directing Sun Ba Power Corp toward compliance with environmental operations.
Political rewards are a reality everywhere, not just in Taiwan, but those rewarded should be suitable for the job they are appointed to do. An appointment must be reasonable. The fact that the economics minister cannot come up with any convincing reasons for the recent appointments runs counter to this fundamental principle. To paraphrase a statement by Ma: If this is not a case of political rewards, then what is?
If Ma wants to take care of his own people by giving them new positions, he should at least make sure that there is a match between their expertise and their new job. To force an appointment regardless of expertise and experience does not look good, and lays bare the government’s lack of values and principles. Small wonder, then, that the government draws criticism and scores very low in opinion polls.
Fan Chiang has rebuffed the criticism, saying that he will run for a legislative seat in Taoyuan. This takes some backbone and should be lauded, while the Ma administration’s use of appointments as reward should be condemned. One can only hope that they will rein in the horses and recall the appointments to avoid yet another stain on Ma’s record.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS