Europe has a strong tradition as a leader in the fight against climate change. However, as of late the continent has reached an ideological impasse over how to address the problem, with environmental sustainability and economic growth often portrayed as being mutually exclusive. If Europe is to remain an environmental leader, as well as a center of innovation and competitiveness, it will have to abandon its ideological rigidness and embrace realistic, pragmatic solutions that can deliver environmental benefits without sacrificing economic development.
The challenges posed by climate change are real, and the consequences of inaction are impossible to ignore. At the same time, there is a growing demand for energy and a desperate need for a long-term exit from the ongoing economic crisis. There is no single, easy solution that addresses both of these imperatives. Reining in global warming while ensuring economic growth would require a balanced portfolio of solutions, including renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. Essential among such solutions is carbon capture and storage.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology captures carbon dioxide at the source of its emission, compresses it, and stores it permanently underground. In doing so, it provides an important bridge between our modern economy, which relies heavily on carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and a future in which carbon dioxide emissions are greatly reduced. This provides the means for maintaining a competitive industrial sector while simultaneously combating global warming.
To be sure, as with any innovation, there are questions about the technology’s viability. Some question the scale of the investment needed to install and maintain the systems necessary for capturing and storing carbon dioxide. However, it is important to note that these costs pale in comparison with the far greater costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions without CCS. According to the International Energy Agency, for example, a 10-year delay in deploying CCS would increase the cost of decarburizing the power sector by 750 billion euros (US$856.6 billion).
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been unequivocal in its insistence that reducing carbon dioxide emissions and diminishing dependence on fossil fuels is more urgent than ever. It has made it clear that CCS, the only technology that can capture at least 90 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions from the world’s largest producers, must be a part of the solution.
CONCRETE ACTION
Beyond Europe’s borders, governments and businesses are already forging ahead. In Canada, the world’s first full-scale CCS project, Boundary Dam, came onstream in October last year, proving that the technology is viable and ready to be deployed. The United Arab Emirates has initiated the world’s first large-scale CCS project in the iron and steel sector. China continues to show great interest in the technology, and is collaborating with the US to develop its CCS capabilities.
Europe cannot afford to lag behind. Energy-intensive industries directly support 4 million jobs across the continent. Investing in CCS would help preserve Europe’s economic base by securing and creating jobs and protecting vital industries. It would help to realize a vision of Europe that supports both sustainability and growth — a vision that is clearly in line with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s priorities of creating jobs, sustaining growth and developing a competitive energy union.
The continent’s largest petroleum companies, and equipment suppliers, are ready to invest what is needed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. However, in order for that to be possible, realistic policies and strategies are needed.
CCS has been recognized at the highest political level as a part of the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy framework and the European Energy Security Strategy. However, it is time to translate recognition into concrete action. That, in turn, requires investment incentives, improved carbon pricing and an upgrade to the emissions trading system. A game-changing solution presupposes substantial political will; it is essential that European leaders show that they know what needs to be done.
Sustainable growth need not be an oxymoron. However, to achieve it, Europe must overcome the ideological stalemate that is paralyzing the environmental debate. To reconcile its environmental priorities with continued growth, it must act realistically, pragmatically and — above all — immediately.
Graeme Sweeney, a former executive vice president at Royal Dutch Shell, is chairman of the Advisory Council of the European Technology Platform of Zero Emission Fossil Fuels Power Plants.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS