Europe has a strong tradition as a leader in the fight against climate change. However, as of late the continent has reached an ideological impasse over how to address the problem, with environmental sustainability and economic growth often portrayed as being mutually exclusive. If Europe is to remain an environmental leader, as well as a center of innovation and competitiveness, it will have to abandon its ideological rigidness and embrace realistic, pragmatic solutions that can deliver environmental benefits without sacrificing economic development.
The challenges posed by climate change are real, and the consequences of inaction are impossible to ignore. At the same time, there is a growing demand for energy and a desperate need for a long-term exit from the ongoing economic crisis. There is no single, easy solution that addresses both of these imperatives. Reining in global warming while ensuring economic growth would require a balanced portfolio of solutions, including renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. Essential among such solutions is carbon capture and storage.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology captures carbon dioxide at the source of its emission, compresses it, and stores it permanently underground. In doing so, it provides an important bridge between our modern economy, which relies heavily on carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and a future in which carbon dioxide emissions are greatly reduced. This provides the means for maintaining a competitive industrial sector while simultaneously combating global warming.
To be sure, as with any innovation, there are questions about the technology’s viability. Some question the scale of the investment needed to install and maintain the systems necessary for capturing and storing carbon dioxide. However, it is important to note that these costs pale in comparison with the far greater costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions without CCS. According to the International Energy Agency, for example, a 10-year delay in deploying CCS would increase the cost of decarburizing the power sector by 750 billion euros (US$856.6 billion).
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been unequivocal in its insistence that reducing carbon dioxide emissions and diminishing dependence on fossil fuels is more urgent than ever. It has made it clear that CCS, the only technology that can capture at least 90 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions from the world’s largest producers, must be a part of the solution.
CONCRETE ACTION
Beyond Europe’s borders, governments and businesses are already forging ahead. In Canada, the world’s first full-scale CCS project, Boundary Dam, came onstream in October last year, proving that the technology is viable and ready to be deployed. The United Arab Emirates has initiated the world’s first large-scale CCS project in the iron and steel sector. China continues to show great interest in the technology, and is collaborating with the US to develop its CCS capabilities.
Europe cannot afford to lag behind. Energy-intensive industries directly support 4 million jobs across the continent. Investing in CCS would help preserve Europe’s economic base by securing and creating jobs and protecting vital industries. It would help to realize a vision of Europe that supports both sustainability and growth — a vision that is clearly in line with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s priorities of creating jobs, sustaining growth and developing a competitive energy union.
The continent’s largest petroleum companies, and equipment suppliers, are ready to invest what is needed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. However, in order for that to be possible, realistic policies and strategies are needed.
CCS has been recognized at the highest political level as a part of the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy framework and the European Energy Security Strategy. However, it is time to translate recognition into concrete action. That, in turn, requires investment incentives, improved carbon pricing and an upgrade to the emissions trading system. A game-changing solution presupposes substantial political will; it is essential that European leaders show that they know what needs to be done.
Sustainable growth need not be an oxymoron. However, to achieve it, Europe must overcome the ideological stalemate that is paralyzing the environmental debate. To reconcile its environmental priorities with continued growth, it must act realistically, pragmatically and — above all — immediately.
Graeme Sweeney, a former executive vice president at Royal Dutch Shell, is chairman of the Advisory Council of the European Technology Platform of Zero Emission Fossil Fuels Power Plants.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS