Europe has a strong tradition as a leader in the fight against climate change. However, as of late the continent has reached an ideological impasse over how to address the problem, with environmental sustainability and economic growth often portrayed as being mutually exclusive. If Europe is to remain an environmental leader, as well as a center of innovation and competitiveness, it will have to abandon its ideological rigidness and embrace realistic, pragmatic solutions that can deliver environmental benefits without sacrificing economic development.
The challenges posed by climate change are real, and the consequences of inaction are impossible to ignore. At the same time, there is a growing demand for energy and a desperate need for a long-term exit from the ongoing economic crisis. There is no single, easy solution that addresses both of these imperatives. Reining in global warming while ensuring economic growth would require a balanced portfolio of solutions, including renewable energy and increased energy efficiency. Essential among such solutions is carbon capture and storage.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology captures carbon dioxide at the source of its emission, compresses it, and stores it permanently underground. In doing so, it provides an important bridge between our modern economy, which relies heavily on carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and a future in which carbon dioxide emissions are greatly reduced. This provides the means for maintaining a competitive industrial sector while simultaneously combating global warming.
To be sure, as with any innovation, there are questions about the technology’s viability. Some question the scale of the investment needed to install and maintain the systems necessary for capturing and storing carbon dioxide. However, it is important to note that these costs pale in comparison with the far greater costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions without CCS. According to the International Energy Agency, for example, a 10-year delay in deploying CCS would increase the cost of decarburizing the power sector by 750 billion euros (US$856.6 billion).
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been unequivocal in its insistence that reducing carbon dioxide emissions and diminishing dependence on fossil fuels is more urgent than ever. It has made it clear that CCS, the only technology that can capture at least 90 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions from the world’s largest producers, must be a part of the solution.
Beyond Europe’s borders, governments and businesses are already forging ahead. In Canada, the world’s first full-scale CCS project, Boundary Dam, came onstream in October last year, proving that the technology is viable and ready to be deployed. The United Arab Emirates has initiated the world’s first large-scale CCS project in the iron and steel sector. China continues to show great interest in the technology, and is collaborating with the US to develop its CCS capabilities.
Europe cannot afford to lag behind. Energy-intensive industries directly support 4 million jobs across the continent. Investing in CCS would help preserve Europe’s economic base by securing and creating jobs and protecting vital industries. It would help to realize a vision of Europe that supports both sustainability and growth — a vision that is clearly in line with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s priorities of creating jobs, sustaining growth and developing a competitive energy union.
The continent’s largest petroleum companies, and equipment suppliers, are ready to invest what is needed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. However, in order for that to be possible, realistic policies and strategies are needed.
CCS has been recognized at the highest political level as a part of the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy framework and the European Energy Security Strategy. However, it is time to translate recognition into concrete action. That, in turn, requires investment incentives, improved carbon pricing and an upgrade to the emissions trading system. A game-changing solution presupposes substantial political will; it is essential that European leaders show that they know what needs to be done.
Sustainable growth need not be an oxymoron. However, to achieve it, Europe must overcome the ideological stalemate that is paralyzing the environmental debate. To reconcile its environmental priorities with continued growth, it must act realistically, pragmatically and — above all — immediately.
Graeme Sweeney, a former executive vice president at Royal Dutch Shell, is chairman of the Advisory Council of the European Technology Platform of Zero Emission Fossil Fuels Power Plants.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly