Democracy of self-interest
The efforts to oust Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) from the legislature in the unprecedented recall vote failed, because only 25 percent of the registered voters showed up, instead of the 50 percent required as a threshold for recalling. Recalling is as difficult as a referendum.
This voting indicates that government officials once elected virtually attain tenure in their positions, irrespective of their performance. Many officials do not care what people want. Their priority is the interest of their party and/or their personal interest.
For example, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) used “the golden decade” as a campaign promise, but Taiwan has lost its status as one of “the four little dragons of Asia.” He wanted to “nullify KMT assets,” but he sold some assets cheaply and used them for elections. When political commentators questioned about the illegal contributions from large corporations in exchange for government favor, he sued these commentators instead of answering their questions.
The young people in the Sunflower movement wanted to talk to Ma, but he was more interested in a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Now 118 people have been indicted as a result of the Sunflower movement protests.
As president, Ma’s main duties are diplomacy, defense and relations with China. Many officials in charge of these fields have resigned. China has drawn a defensive line close to Penghu, Ma cannot do anything. He has signed many agreements with China even if China has modern missiles aimed at Taiwan. His popularity has dropped from the most to the least.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Lean means less waste
Ko P’s — a popular nickname for Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — rapid rise and his first month’s performance as Taipei mayor have opened many people’s eyes, including the international community. Other than his blunt style, straightforwardness and speed of action, his most prominent acts have been following a standard operating procedure (SOP) and saying that there is always room for improvement.
Actually, Ko P’s fondness for reading implies that he might have perused the latest in quality management books.Among them, there are books on lean manufacturing, a method which originated with the Japanese and has been widely applied in manufacturing and lately also to management. Simply put, a lean process reduces waste.
Before identifying waste in the process, current practices need to be identified and documented, and this is the so-called SOP. Ko’s most famous SOP involves the MG149 account at National Taiwan Hospital University, which was singled out by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾). One of Lo’s comments about MG149 was about the SOP, which had been revised many times.
As it is an account, she probably could not understand why an SOP needed to be revised so many times. In the spirit of continuous improvement, a process always needs to be revised to improve efficiency and leanness based on newly acquired data. An SOP is not a fixture, but a living document of current best practices.
As a quality professional, I find it amazing that Ko P is able to adopt quality management theory into political practice. He does not have the experienced politician’s baggage, including ideas of what can be done and what cannot. He does not follow the conventional wisdom of what a politician should be doing in a situation, but instead his only guide is his scientific training of how to create the optimum process.
The old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) political system, which inherited a lot of Chinese court culture, always deifies the chosen leader. That is, the chosen leader is always right, and thus any decision or decree made by the leader is always right and cannot be challenged.
This explains why Ko P’s approach and actions really open up a window, letting fresh air into the staid and stinking air that saturates the political sense in Taiwan. Ko P’s actions are not new, but his application of leanness into politics is.
Shin Ta Liu
San Diego, California
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”