The news from China these days is mostly depressing, owing to the government’s escalating crackdown on its critics.
However, what few observers — particularly economic analysts — seem to understand is that the Chinese leadership’s fight against liberalism and “Western values” is directly undermining its efforts to root out official corruption, promote innovation and entrepreneurship, and deepen engagement with the outside world. The regime’s retrograde politics will have serious consequences for China’s continued economic development.
For starters, the government has intensified its censorship of the Internet, rendering popular portals and sites — including Google, Facebook and the New York Times’ Web site — all but inaccessible. Moreover, prominent human-rights lawyers have been jailed; the well-known free-speech advocate Pu Zhiqiang (蒲志強), for one, has already been held for more than six months, while prosecutors attempt to build a case against him.
Meanwhile, senior Chinese officials have taken to enforcing political discipline within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
In June last year, Zhang Yingwei (張英偉), head of the party’s discipline inspection office at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), said that the institution — China’s most prestigious government-run think tank — had been “infiltrated by foreign forces” and “was conducting illegal collusion at politically sensitive times.”
Zhao Shengxuan (趙勝軒), CASS vice president and deputy party boss, responded by pledging that the academy would “treat political discipline as a criterion of the utmost importance in the assessment of academics.”
Soon after, CASS president Wang Weiguang (王偉光) thundered in an essay that class struggle would never be extinguished in China.
Chinese academia more broadly has been the regime’s chief target in its search for enemies, with universities dismissing professors for espousing “seditious” ideas like constitutionalism. In a particularly egregious case, an official newspaper in Liaoning province dispatched reporters disguised as students to college classrooms to catch professors criticizing the regime.
A recent pronouncement by Chinese Minister of Education Yuan Guiren (袁貴仁) threatens to do damage on a far larger scale. Yuan has vowed never to allow textbooks “promoting Western values” — especially those who “attack or defame the leadership of the Party or smear socialism” — into Chinese classrooms.
Given Yuan’s position, this pledge could effectively amount to official policy. One hopes, for China’s sake, that it does not.
The recent onslaught against free speech and Western values reflects the central political challenge facing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who must transform a one-party system enfeebled by greed and mistrust into a well-ordered, ideologically united regime capable of carrying out market-based reforms and sustaining its own long-term survival. A crackdown on liberalism, he seems to believe, will work alongside his anti-corruption campaign to advance this goal.
This vision is as intellectually flawed as it is impractical. However hard one tries, it is virtually impossible to root out corruption in a one-party system without press freedom, a robust civil society or the rule of law. Yet these are precisely the “Western values” that CCP apparatchiks are attempting to eliminate.
China will pay dearly for this mistake. Consider the impact of Yuan’s textbook campaign on China’s 28 million college undergraduates, who would be left with substandard course materials. How could these students be expected to compete in the global economy, when their education has been compromised?
The current trend implies deteriorating conditions for their teachers as well, particularly in the social sciences and humanities, as academics face tighter restrictions on academic exchanges with the West. With fewer opportunities to attend conferences abroad, publish papers in Western academic journals or spend time teaching or conducting research outside of China, their professional development and careers could be severely impaired.
As a result, the government’s suppression of “Western values” — not to mention its relentless war on the Internet — is likely to spur an exodus of the country’s best and brightest. In 2013, an unprecedented 413,900 Chinese studied abroad — and the figure is expected to be even higher for last year. Of those, 90 percent chose to study in Western countries (plus Japan).
To be sure, only a small fraction of college-age Chinese students attend universities overseas. Indeed, the number of students who went abroad in 2013 was equivalent to only 6 percent of the students admitted to Chinese universities.
However, China’s ruling elite, far from writing off this group as the price of its long-term survival, is leading the rush to the exits — largely sending its children to the Ivy League and Oxbridge. One wonders whether CCP leaders worry that their offspring will be brainwashed by Western values; they evidently already are reluctant to send their children to local universities. And, if Yuan has his way, China’s universities would increasingly look like their North Korean counterparts, rather than world-class Western institutions.
That would have far-reaching — and devastating — consequences. The tens of millions of students who remain in China would not gain the knowledge and skills needed to maintain, much less improve, the economy’s global competitiveness. Indeed, given that innovation is critical to China’s continued economic development — a point that Xi has repeatedly emphasized — a war against Western influence in Chinese education is downright irrational.
Unless the government’s crackdown ends soon, Xi’s “Chinese dream” of national greatness and prosperity will turn into a nightmare of accelerating decline and increasing backwardness. One way or the other, the war on Western values is a war that China can only lose.
Minxin Pei is a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College and a non-resident senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the US.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the