Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) reaction to the “One Billion Rising” rally, organized by the Garden of Hope Foundation on Jan. 12, was very disappointing.
When Ko was invited to dance with a group of children on stage, he became angry and scolded Department of Social Welfare Commissioner Hsu Li-min (許立民) on the spot, using foul language. Such a reaction makes one consider the difficulties facing all men in Taiwan. Even if Ko does not like surprises, he should not have reacted that way. Dancing is not “damn show playing,” as Ko said, and dancing does not make him a clown.
Dancing is a matter of innate human kinetic energy and the most commonly shared body language, as it allows us to feel our innermost emotions. The ability to move our bodies to express feelings is the best gift humans could have been given.
This is precisely why the One Billion Rising campaign uses dancing as a medium for participants to find the emotions in their bodies and release them to free themselves. The campaign advocates the idea that human bodies should be free of any fetters or violent restrictions. Dancing allows us to display the vitality deep in our souls and returns our power over our bodies.
The global campaign has entered its third year, and it has called on tens of millions of people to dance around the world. About 13,000 international organizations and countless celebrities worldwide have responded to it, including UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UNiTE To End Violence Against Women, Croatian President Ivo Josipovic, San Francisco Mayor Edwin Lee, the Dalai Lama, the Los Angeles City Council and many more. Many supporters are not only politicians, but also men.
However in Taiwan, most male politicians are quite rigid and do not express emotions easily. They do not like to dance, let alone in front of others, because they worry that they will make fools of themselves. Perhaps the biggest problem lies in the Taiwanese cultural attitude toward the body and dancing. Ko was raised as a typical man in this “macho world.” This culture does not encourage men to dance, and those who like to do so can face various limitations beginning at a young age and be mocked for being “sissies.”
Men who are afraid of dancing might suppress their feelings. Since they are unable to release their feelings, they are missing out on a lot of fun. It is hard for them to speak their mind under such restraints.
The result of long-term suppression might be that violence is used as an outlet, including the use of violent language.
In terms of the “affective education” for boys in Taiwan, the only core ideology is masculinity. However, this ideology might bring up unhealthy men. It is also a source of violence, because the essence of it is to maintain control — or not to lose control. This can turn into oppression or violence. The public seems to believe that a person capable of controlling everything is a hero, and this mentality often exaggerates the importance of standard operating procedures.
In the tight framework boys are raised in, they are told not to cry, not to be gentle, not to share, not to fail, not to be weak, not to be dependent and not to be feminine. They are told to be brave.
They also like to compare their sexuality and achievements, and are taught to make money to support their families and use foul language. Playing the game of “aruba” — in which several boys separate a boy’s legs and rub his groin against a pole, a door or a corner — has become the clearest definition of boys’ gender roles as they grow up.
Joining sports teams, playing pranks on girls and sexual games like aruba are considered “peer games” that form bonds among boys, while girls are not allowed to participate. However, such games can plant the seeds of violence.
When control and aggression in masculine ideology become key values, they are also brought into all kinds of relationships.
No wonder there is so much violence around the world.
According to a 2012 WHO report, one-third of all women experience gender or sexual violence at least once in their lives. Since there are at least 3 billion girls and women in the world, which means that more than 1 billion have been mistreated.
US activist Eve Ensler saw the seriousness of the problem and she stood up first to dance for all girls, hoping that 1 billion people, including men, women and victims of violence, would stand and dance together someday.
The One Billion Rising rally offers an opportunity. Taiwan’s male politicians should take the lead and call on all men to stand up and dance. They should link themselves with more than 10 million people around the world and move, feel and untie their bodies together in order to free themselves. This is something that male Taiwanese politicians can do for female Taiwanese victims of violence.
Chi Hui-jung is executive director of the Garden of Hope Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether