Global crude oil prices fell to a five-and-a-half-year low on Sunday last week as Brent crude oil futures hit the critical tipping point of US$50 per barrel, sending shockwaves through international stock markets and causing the value of the euro to decline to a nine-year low. The slide in prices continues the downward trend of the past six months, since peaking at US$115 per barrel on June 19 last year, leaving green industries significantly concerned over a potential negative impact on their ability to find financing, as the outlook remains unclear.
Following 36 hours of negotiation at the closing meeting of last month’s annual UN Climate Change Conference, an outline plan seems to have been agreed to tackle the issue of how to make up for a projected 10 billion metric tonne shortfall in the 2020 carbon reduction target, with each signatory nation providing “intended nationally determined contributions.” With the key basis for calculating profit, loss and long-term planning — crude oil prices — having declined significantly, is the world suddenly about to enter a period of drastic climate change from which there can be no recovery?
The continuing slide in oil prices is not due to the discovery of vast new oil fields, but has been caused by in-fighting within international climate politics and a price war between energy producers, triggered by wide-scale development of shale oil and gas in the US. In and among this sits the Russian supply of natural gas to Europe, based on its own strategic considerations, and the self-preservationist policies of Middle Eastern nations as a counter to the US shale revolution.
In addition, there is the longstanding sentimental attachment to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change’s joint protocol on carbon reduction.
The coming storm seems to have caused exporting countries to engage in price-dumping, using cheap supply to bolster demand, which has comprehensively disrupted the price structure of energy markets, and in doing so wiped out the alternative energy market, pulling the rug from under its feet.
The IMF predicts that each time the price of crude oil falls by US$10, the global economy will grow by 0.3 to 0.8 percent. In other words, falling oil prices cause energy prices to slide, which has a positive effect on economic growth. It is estimated that this year global economic growth will reach 4 percent.
The US, as a major energy consumer and emitter of carbon dioxide, is already surging ahead. In the past six months, it has experienced rapid economic recovery, while exporting nations, including Taiwan, are benefiting from the resulting strong increase in demand. Prosperity has returned and unemployment is down. It appears that, with the rocketing ahead of the “bellwether” US economy leading to a huge increase in consumption of oil, coal and other carbon-containing energy sources, each nation’s pledge to reduce carbon emissions will be broken.
Since 2008, Taiwan’s energy resource intensity has fallen year-on-year, with an average yearly improvement of approximately 2.5 percent. According to this trend, before 2020, Taiwan will be able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 2005 levels, thereby achieving President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) declared carbon reduction goal.
Considering that the nation imports approximately 300 million barrels of crude oil per year and international oil prices have been cut in half, Taiwan can save approximately US$1.5 billion in oil purchase costs. This would contribute 2 percent toward GDP and has been described by central bank governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) as a “tax cut.”
For an energy-hungry, exporting nation such as Taiwan, this provides a welcome boost to the economy, which is this year expected to grow by about 4 percent. In addition, the price of gasoline at pumps has already been cut an unprecedented 17 consecutive times over the past six months, and 95 octane unleaded gasoline is about to fall to NT$25 a liter. The public has sensed this, which will undoubtedly lead to an increase in the consumption of all types of energy. If exports flourish, and the government and private sector join forces in an all-out economic push, this year’s carbon emissions will certainly increase sharply.
Whether it is frequent extreme global weather events, havoc caused by heatwaves and cold snaps, or droughts and floods, humanity, as the Western saying goes, will be “courting disaster.” However, hesitation and caution are not permitted during the making of easy profits. Thus, the invisible hand — prices — which stimulate markets, industries and individuals, as if through the waving of a magic wand, throws up a misty fog of glimmering profits, distracting people’s gazes from the ultimate fate of humanity. The grand plan of global carbon reduction now seems to be a lost cause, with global warming the only possible outcome.
Wei Kuo-yen is minister of the Environmental Protection Administration.
Translated by Edward Jones
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS