Taiwanese have long been concerned about China’s infringement of its space on the international stage. Now they have to be worried about its increasing infringement on the nation’s air space.
In yet another slap in the face to Taipei, Beijing this week said that as of the beginning of March, it would add four new air routes to reduce congestion between Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta. The crucial north-south route, labeled M503, would run nearly parallel to the median line of the Taiwan Strait and come as close as 7.8km to it.
That Beijing made the announcement without consulting Taiwanese authorities in advance was yet another sign that it pays only lip service to the idea of cross-strait negotiations and dealing with Taipei as an equal. The comment by a spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office that the nation should show “more understanding and less suspicion” was a prime example of Chinese superciliousness.
Taiwanese authorities say the proposed routes would conflict with existing ones. While the new routes would fall under the jurisdiction of the Shanghai Flight Information Region (FIR), the nearness of M503 to the Taipei FIR means that Taiwanese air traffic controllers would have to worry about it, especially during bad weather.
The Taipei FIR, which covers 180,000 square nautical miles (about 617,383km2), is responsible for some of the busiest airspace in the region. It is bordered by Japan’s Fukuoka FIR, the Hong Kong FIR, the Shanghai FIR and the Manila FIR, and its western boundary runs close to the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
In 2013, it was estimated that about 1.3 million flights carrying 40 million travelers pass through the Taipei FIR annually. Air traffic, both passenger and cargo, has only grown since then.
Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂) said the government has protested to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) over the new routes and urged Beijing to negotiate on the issue with Taipei. However, Beijing said it had already cleared the four routes with the ICAO — although one Chinese official added that it was willing to “communicate” with Taipei over the matter.
This incident is another reminder of the nation’s impotence because of its exclusion from membership in UN-related organizations and agencies since the Republic of China lost its UN seat in 1971.
The government hailed its ability to send representatives to the ICAO assembly in October 2013 for the first time in decades as a breakthrough resulting from its efforts to ease cross-strait tensions, but the truth is that they were only there as “guests” of the ICAO council president because China had blocked efforts by the US and several other nations for Taiwan to gain even observer status in the organization.
It is hard not to see this week’s actions as a follow-up to the November 2013 declaration of an air defense identification zone over a large portion of the East China Sea. Beijing has once again shown that it is not willing to be, or interested in being, a team player or a responsible actor on either a regional or global stage. It just keeps nibbling away, pushing the boundaries and hoping that others will be too intimidated to push back.
The Chinese move to unilaterally establish air routes is not something that Beijing can claim to be “a purely domestic affair.” Aviation traffic safety is an international concern and relies upon smoothly integrated teamwork by air traffic controllers from neighboring nations, who must respect and trust each other’s decisions.
There has been a lot of press in China recently about the bad behavior of Chinese air passengers as well as tourists abroad, with the government considering publishing a national blacklist to shame travelers into behaving in a “more civilized” manner to earn international respect. It is clearly a lesson that has yet to be learned at the top in Beijing as well.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of