The Taipei Dome, being built on the site of the old Songshan Tobacco Factory, has been steeped in controversy since its inception. After taking office, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) reviewed the development and pledged to consider the necessity of removing trees from the area. Farglory Land Development Co chairman Chao Teng-hsiung (趙藤雄), who is eager to get on with the project, then held a press conference at which he asked for a meeting with Ko and said that “frankly speaking, these trees are ugly ... more beautiful trees could be planted there later,” adding that it seemed “human life is worth less than the life of a tree.”
In saying trees are more valuable than people, Chao was referring to a planned underground passage that would double as an emergency exit from the Taipei Dome. The blueprint shows that the passage would be 80m wide, but since commercial premises are planned along its sides, only 18m would remain in the middle — a greatly reduced width from that intended in the original plan.
If it is a requirement that a passage doubling as an emergency exit must be 80m wide, then an underground shopping arcade should not be built there. Farglory is planning to profit from leasing shop space in the passage. If 18m is enough to provide the passage with emergency exit facilities, then the whole design could be narrowed and the trees would not have to be moved.
Chao’s statements about the trees have become the target of much ridicule and criticism on the Internet. Organizations that want to preserve the trees say that it is 87 trees, not 33, that are at stake, and that another 50 have already been moved — and died. Chao’s statement that other trees can be planted to replace trees that have been cut down is a long-term pledge that does not carry much credibility.
Since the plans for the Taipei Dome were initiated in 2007, tree-preservation organizations have been advocating the protection of more than 1,000 trees in the area. In 2009, a 100-year-old camphor tree said to be the largest in Taipei was moved. The Green Party’s Calvin Wen (溫炳原) and Pan Han-shen (潘翰聲) climbed the tree to try and protect it, while their comrade Yu Yi (游藝) tried to stop a crane from moving the tree. In the end it was moved — and died.
Land surrounding the dome is expensive. Farglory has done all it can to expand the commercial area and volume. The Taipei City Government approved it all and started to cut down trees, calling it “site preparation.” Hundreds of trees were pushed over by excavators and then hacked into pieces, as Farglory’s only concern was to clear the site.
There have been many calls for a return to the original design, which only included the dome structure, while reducing the surrounding commercial facilities and preserving more trees and greenery and protecting the city environment, but these calls have been all but ignored.
Many people say that Farglory’s escalation of the conflict is a response to the Ko administration replacing that of former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) — which was very well-inclined toward the company. Farglory, which has now lost its support in City Hall, could be facing fines over the project, which is well behind schedule. If the city government forces changes to the design of the underground passage due to the controversy over the trees, that would give Farglory a legitimate reason for delaying construction.
The city government should insist on protecting the trees and the environment, and treat every tree as an important environmental asset that must not be lost.
Each of the Taipei Dome project’s many problems should be clarified and eliminated one by one.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when