What will 2015 bring?
The first day of this year was very foggy and confusing for Taiwanese identity and nationality.
What can we expect this year?
The morning news quoted Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) New Year message as starting with a greeting that included “Taiwanese compatriots,” as if Taiwan were part of China, making all Taiwanese sick and giving them goose bumps all over.
In Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) delivered a message calling for social reconciliation, cross-party cooperation and cross-strait peace. He even emphasized his willingness to take responsibility for whatever blame and complaints are laid against the government. Obviously, Ma’s message does not make any sense to the public. People know that all the difficulties Taiwan faces today are tied to him. The question is whether Ma is willing to change his selfish “China-first” policy.
Before the New Year, Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) said that once the medical evaluation of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was confirmed, his medical parole would be approved and he would be released immediately. While the whole nation was watching, the release was delayed, reportedly because of a traffic jam. It was a lousy excuse to blame the mail delivery system.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said the documents could have been sent by fax or e-mail in just three seconds, and wondered why it took four or five hours instead. In view of Ma’s New Year message of social reconciliation, it was ironic that the government postponed the granting of medical parole for Chen, who has been jailed more than six years.
Unfortunately, after six years, Ma still does not know why people dislike him and why his popularity has dropped to 9.2 percent. Is it his failed “6-3-3” campaign pledge, or his double standards that profit only big business, and not the underpaid college graduates? Or is it because his aides convicted of corruption remain free?
On the same day, the Republic of China (ROC) national flag was raised at the Twin Oaks Estate in Washington.
Representative to the US Shen Lyu-shun (沈呂巡) said the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) had notified the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) beforehand about the event and received approval from US President Barack Obama’s administration.
Shen said that “we not only returned, but we did it with dignity, respect and honor.”
Is this true? It sounds like the US has reinstated its diplomatic relations with the ROC. Shen, as a representative of TECRO, does not even know whom he represents. TECRO’s office is representing Taiwan, not the ROC. The White House sent a clear message that it is willing to upgrade relations with Taiwan, not with the ROC.
That is exactly the dilemma Taiwan is facing today. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Ma’s government have always taken advantage and abused Taiwan’s credit to extend the illusion of the ROC to the overseas Chinese community, misleading Taiwanese to believe that Taiwan is part of the ROC and that the ROC is China. In today’s real world, the only China recognized by the international community is the People’s Republic of China (PRC), not the ROC.
So this year, one of the most important challenges to Taiwanese is to identify their nationality. Are we Taiwanese, or are we Chinese under the PRC or the ROC? Does the US want to void the three communiques and the “one China” policy and reinstate diplomatic relations with the ROC or will it decide to enforce the Taiwan Relations Act and review Taiwan’s status?
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.