Sky Zoo’s hippopotamus “A-ho” put Taiwan in the global media spotlight following the brouhaha after it was badly injured during transportation and ultimately died from the injuries it sustained. A-ho’s death is bound to damage the nation’s reputation for animal welfare.
The recent deaths of a white whale, a dolphin, an alpaca and A-ho showcased the owners’ primary concern — money — and highlighted authorities’ woefully inadequate attitude toward animal rights law enforcement.
The animals’ deaths should also prompt the public to consider animals welfare in environments such as zoos and aquariums.
These settings are created to cater for human curiosity and for people to educate themselves about animals, but people should pay more attention to the importance of animal care and welfare, and acquire a proper appreciation of nature and its value.
Mahatma Gandhi once said: “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”
The government has never given due attention to animal welfare. Laws are slack and the enforcement of such laws even more so. Every time things go wrong, those in charge always evade responsibility by saying that there is no law regulating management. The media pay attention for a day or two and then move on to something else. That is why problems surrounding animal abuse are never solved and the nation’s reputation continues to suffer.
Hippos, white whales, dolphins and manatees are protected animals. According to the Wildlife Conservation Act (野生動物保育法), breeding, selling, importing, exporting or exhibiting protected animals requires approval by authorities. To apply for approval to breed and raise protected animals, an educational or academic research plan must be submitted. Breeding and raising must be undertaken in compliance with the regulations.
The problem is that authorities fail to firmly enforce regulations. Even if mistreatment is exposed by individuals or animal-rights groups, authorities often impose a light penalty, and in some cases even defend the wrongdoer, rendering any punishment utterly ineffective.
In light of criticism over recent incidents, the government should explain exactly how the importation of the alpaca and the white whale was approved and how the authorities followed up on the management of the animals.
A-ho’s unnecessary death is by no means an isolated incident. The public should demand that the government act swiftly to fix shortcomings in the law. In addition to amending the law so that it safeguards animal rights and respects their existence, authorities should also conduct comprehensive investigations of the environments provided by a facility for its animals; its capacity to care properly for the animals; the nutritional wellbeing of the animals and the equipment provided by recreational farms and big aquariums — to make sure that they comply with regulations. Serious and repeat offenders should be shut down. It is time that authorities stopped taking their duties so lightly.
Lastly, since people claim to be the only ones capable of making moral judgements, and since academics say that animal rights and animal rights movements go hand-in-hand with social evolution as whole, people should ponder if it is civilized behavior to imprison animals in confined spaces and ignore their needs simply because they want to look at them and be entertained by them from time to time.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the