On Dec. 17, US President Barack Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro announced that the US and Cuba would normalize relations after 53 years. It was the end of one of the last vestiges of the Cold War.
During this period, the US had isolated Cuba politically and economically in its attempts to bring about a change of government away from the Castro-led Communist regime. Obama felt, rightly so, that this policy was not working, and is now shifting to a policy of engagement.
However, there is still another vestige of anachronistic thinking around that dates back to the 1970s — the lack of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. At that time, Taiwan was ruled by Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the losing side of the Chinese Civil War. Chiang had escaped China in 1949 and imposed his repressive regime on Taiwan, while continuing to claim to represent all of China.
In the 1970s, this claim became less tenable. In October 1971, Chiang’s representatives — who did not even represent Taiwan at the time, let alone China — were kicked out of the UN. In December 1978, then-US president Jimmy Carter decided to break relations with the Republic of China and establish diplomatic ties with the People’s Republic of China.
That break in relations further delegitimized the repressive KMT regime, and in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the Taiwanese, under the guidance of Taiwan’s “Father of Democracy,” former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), brought about a momentous transition to democracy.
The fact that it now has a democracy should be a good reason for the US and other Western nations to normalize relations with Taiwan, and establish diplomatic relations with the nation. Instead, there is an endless reiteration of the “one China” mantra that perpetuates Taiwan’s diplomatic isolation.
The problem is of course that China persists in claiming sovereignty over Taiwan, threatening retribution if other nations move toward recognition of the country.
The answer lies not in kowtowing to China, but in convincing the rulers in Beijing that its own interests would be served best if it normalizes relations with Taiwan.
Accepting Taiwan as a friendly neighbor would be so much better than perpetuating the current hostile policies of blocking relations between Taiwan and other nations, and attempting to prevent Taiwan’s full membership in international organizations. This zero-sum game by China is indeed a relic of the past.
However, by itself, the current Chinese government will not easily deviate from the trodden path; authoritarian regimes rarely do. So it is essential for the US and other Western nations to make a concerted effort to open the way for diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
As was shown in Nov. 29’s nine-in-one elections, Taiwan is now a vibrant democracy in which the populace values good governance and transparency, and rejects the old ways of the past. Taiwanese have also made it abundantly clear that they want to be a full and equal member of the international family of nations.
If Obama can normalize relations with a regime that is still not democratic in Cuba, then certainly he can find ways to move toward normalization with a free and democratic Taiwan. That would be the kind of change everyone can believe in.
Mark Kao is president of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs, a Taiwanese-American grassroots organization based in Washington.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS