How very saddening to see reports of members of the Hualon Self-Help Organization and the National Freeway Toll Collectors Association constantly having to protest.
The Hualon group is demanding that its members receive delayed pension and salary payments, of which they have received less than 60 percent of what they are owed. Some might say something is better than nothing.
Beginning tomorrow, the toll collectors group is to conduct a hunger strike protest in front of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) central headquarters in Taipei that is set to last until the eve of the nine-in-one elections, calling on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) not to just think of the elections, but to care more about workers and address these problems.
The Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) stipulates: “An employer shall appropriate a certain sum of money every month and deposit the same in a special account as the reserve fund for retirement benefits for workers.”
It also says failure to do this will incur a fine and the employer will be required to make the fact publicly known and to address the issue within a stated period of time.
How would you feel if you had worked hard for a company your whole life, only to find you would not receive the money you are due simply because the government — local and central — has failed to enforce the law? If it were you, wouldn’t you be on the streets protesting, too?
Ma, as KMT chairman, back when he was campaigning for the chairmanship, promised he would address the issue of the party’s ill-gotten assets before 2008. It is well-known the party has many tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars in assets and that it could conclude these protests with a small fraction of this money.
It would also, at the same time, be able to conform to the Sept. 10, 2012, article by lawyer C.V. Chen (陳長文), former convener of the KMT’s supervisory committee to resolve the issue of its stolen assets, entitled Profits from party assets now used for public good (黨產收益,現在就做公益), in which Chen argued for returning the illegally appropriated assets in full and using them to address social issues.
If these were used, for example, to resolve the aforementioned protests, surely this would also make people trust Ma, more, too.
Yu Ying-fu is a lawyer.
Translated by Paul Cooper
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: