The Ebola crisis reminds us, once again, of the downside of globalization. Not only good things — like principles of social justice and gender equality — cross borders more easily than ever before; so do malign influences, like environmental problems and disease.
The crisis also reminds us of the importance of government and civil society. We do not turn to the private sector to control the spread of a disease like Ebola. Rather, we turn to institutions — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the US, the WHO and Medecins Sans Frontieres, the remarkable group of doctors and nurses who risk their lives to save those of others in poor countries around the world.
Even right-wing fanatics who want to dismantle government institutions turn to them when facing a crisis like that caused by Ebola. Governments may not do a perfect job in addressing such crises, but one of the reasons that they have not done as well as we would hope is that we have underfunded the relevant agencies at the national and global level.
Illustration: Mountain People
The Ebola episode also holds further lessons.
One reason that the disease spread so rapidly in Liberia and Sierra Leone is that both are war-ravaged countries, where a large proportion of the population is malnourished and the healthcare system has been devastated.
Moreover, where the private sector does play an essential role — vaccine development — it has little incentive to devote resources to diseases that afflict the poor or poor countries. It is only when advanced countries are threatened that there is sufficient impetus to invest in vaccines to confront diseases such as Ebola.
This is not so much a criticism of the private sector; after all, drug companies are not in business out of the goodness of their hearts and there is no money in preventing or curing the diseases of the poor. Rather, what the Ebola crisis calls into question is our reliance on the private sector to do the things that governments perform best. Indeed, it appears that with more public funding, an Ebola vaccine could have been developed years ago.
The US’ failures in this regard have drawn particular attention — so much so that some African countries are treating visitors from the US with special precautions — but this just echoes a more fundamental problem: the largely private healthcare system in the US is failing.
True, at the top end, the US has some of the world’s leading hospitals, research universities and advanced medical centers, but though the US spends more per capita and as a percentage of its GDP on medical care than any other country, its health outcomes are truly disappointing.
Male life expectancy at birth in the US is the worst of 17 high-income countries — almost four years shorter than in Switzerland, Australia and Japan — and it is the second worst for women, more than five years below life expectancy in Japan.
Other health metrics are equally disappointing, with data indicating poorer health outcomes for Americans throughout their lives and, for at least three decades, matters have been getting worse.
Many factors contribute to the health lag in the US, with lessons that are relevant for other countries as well.
For starters, access to medicine matters. With the US among the few advanced countries that does not recognize access as a basic human right, and more reliant than others on the private sector, it is no surprise that many Americans do not get the medicines they need. Though the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) has improved matters, health-insurance coverage remains weak, with almost half of the 50 US states refusing to expand Medicaid, the healthcare financing program for the poor in the US.
Moreover, the US has one of the highest rates of childhood poverty among advanced countries (which was especially true before austerity policies dramatically increased poverty in several European countries) and a lack of nutrition and healthcare in childhood has lifelong effects.
Meanwhile, the US’ gun laws contribute to the highest incidence of violent deaths among advanced countries and its dependence on the automobile underpins a high rate of highway fatalities.
The US’ outsize inequality, too, is a critical factor in its health lag, especially combined with the factors mentioned above. With more poverty, more childhood poverty, more people without access to healthcare, decent housing and education, and more people facing food insecurity (often consuming cheap foods that contribute to obesity), it is no surprise that US health outcomes are bad.
However, health outcomes are also worse in the US than elsewhere for those with higher incomes and insurance coverage. Perhaps this, too, is related to higher inequality than in other advanced countries.
Health, we know, is related to stress. Those striving to climb the ladder of success know the consequences of failure. In the US, the rungs of the ladder are farther apart than elsewhere and the distance from the top to the bottom is greater. That means more anxiety, which translates into poorer health.
Good health is a blessing, but how countries structure their healthcare system — and their society — makes a huge difference in terms of outcomes. The US and the world pay a high price for excessive reliance on market forces and an insufficient attention to broader values, including equality and social justice.
Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is a professor at Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS