The Ebola crisis reminds us, once again, of the downside of globalization. Not only good things — like principles of social justice and gender equality — cross borders more easily than ever before; so do malign influences, like environmental problems and disease.
The crisis also reminds us of the importance of government and civil society. We do not turn to the private sector to control the spread of a disease like Ebola. Rather, we turn to institutions — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the US, the WHO and Medecins Sans Frontieres, the remarkable group of doctors and nurses who risk their lives to save those of others in poor countries around the world.
Even right-wing fanatics who want to dismantle government institutions turn to them when facing a crisis like that caused by Ebola. Governments may not do a perfect job in addressing such crises, but one of the reasons that they have not done as well as we would hope is that we have underfunded the relevant agencies at the national and global level.
Illustration: Mountain People
The Ebola episode also holds further lessons.
One reason that the disease spread so rapidly in Liberia and Sierra Leone is that both are war-ravaged countries, where a large proportion of the population is malnourished and the healthcare system has been devastated.
Moreover, where the private sector does play an essential role — vaccine development — it has little incentive to devote resources to diseases that afflict the poor or poor countries. It is only when advanced countries are threatened that there is sufficient impetus to invest in vaccines to confront diseases such as Ebola.
This is not so much a criticism of the private sector; after all, drug companies are not in business out of the goodness of their hearts and there is no money in preventing or curing the diseases of the poor. Rather, what the Ebola crisis calls into question is our reliance on the private sector to do the things that governments perform best. Indeed, it appears that with more public funding, an Ebola vaccine could have been developed years ago.
The US’ failures in this regard have drawn particular attention — so much so that some African countries are treating visitors from the US with special precautions — but this just echoes a more fundamental problem: the largely private healthcare system in the US is failing.
True, at the top end, the US has some of the world’s leading hospitals, research universities and advanced medical centers, but though the US spends more per capita and as a percentage of its GDP on medical care than any other country, its health outcomes are truly disappointing.
Male life expectancy at birth in the US is the worst of 17 high-income countries — almost four years shorter than in Switzerland, Australia and Japan — and it is the second worst for women, more than five years below life expectancy in Japan.
Other health metrics are equally disappointing, with data indicating poorer health outcomes for Americans throughout their lives and, for at least three decades, matters have been getting worse.
Many factors contribute to the health lag in the US, with lessons that are relevant for other countries as well.
For starters, access to medicine matters. With the US among the few advanced countries that does not recognize access as a basic human right, and more reliant than others on the private sector, it is no surprise that many Americans do not get the medicines they need. Though the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) has improved matters, health-insurance coverage remains weak, with almost half of the 50 US states refusing to expand Medicaid, the healthcare financing program for the poor in the US.
Moreover, the US has one of the highest rates of childhood poverty among advanced countries (which was especially true before austerity policies dramatically increased poverty in several European countries) and a lack of nutrition and healthcare in childhood has lifelong effects.
Meanwhile, the US’ gun laws contribute to the highest incidence of violent deaths among advanced countries and its dependence on the automobile underpins a high rate of highway fatalities.
The US’ outsize inequality, too, is a critical factor in its health lag, especially combined with the factors mentioned above. With more poverty, more childhood poverty, more people without access to healthcare, decent housing and education, and more people facing food insecurity (often consuming cheap foods that contribute to obesity), it is no surprise that US health outcomes are bad.
However, health outcomes are also worse in the US than elsewhere for those with higher incomes and insurance coverage. Perhaps this, too, is related to higher inequality than in other advanced countries.
Health, we know, is related to stress. Those striving to climb the ladder of success know the consequences of failure. In the US, the rungs of the ladder are farther apart than elsewhere and the distance from the top to the bottom is greater. That means more anxiety, which translates into poorer health.
Good health is a blessing, but how countries structure their healthcare system — and their society — makes a huge difference in terms of outcomes. The US and the world pay a high price for excessive reliance on market forces and an insufficient attention to broader values, including equality and social justice.
Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is a professor at Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
Since taking office, President William Lai (賴清德) has been an active proponent of the Healthy Taiwan initiative. As a member of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, I have also contributed recommendations on various pharmaceutical policies. After the committee concluded its seventh meeting on Saturday last week, Lai announced that the government is considering a three-year suspension on the Drug Expenditure Target (DET) system’s routine drug price surveys, highlighting the need to further support drug supply resilience. While I am supportive of this policy direction, I must also stress the importance of maintaining our original objective of improving the quality of
RSS