China and South Korea have concluded free-trade agreement (FTA) negotiations. Their agreement will have a massive economic impact on the two countries, as well as Taiwan, and the news has shaken many on this side of the Taiwan Strait.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs immediately released an estimate saying the agreement would cost Taiwan’s economy NT$650 billion (US$21.23 billion) and shave 0.5 of a percentage point off the nation’s GDP. Labor and industry organizations have called on the government to quickly conclude talks on a trade in goods agreement with China. The government responded that the opposition parties and non-governmental organizations are blocking the passage of the service trade agreement as well as talks about the establishment of free economic pilot zones and the trade in goods pact.
The Seoul-Beijing FTA will indeed have a great impact on Taiwan, but it will not be as bad as the ministry makes out. The ministry estimates that the display-panel industry will suffer the biggest blow, followed by the petroleum, steel, textiles, machine tool, glass and automotive industries. Last year, the display-panel industry exported products worth NT$509.2 billion to China, and according to the estimate, orders worth NT$109 billion will be diverted over the next three years.
However, under the Seoul-Beijing FTA, tariffs will be removed only after 10 years, which casts doubt on the ministry’s claim that orders worth NT$109 billion will be diverted in the next three years. Meanwhile, the automotive and car parts industries are not being deregulated. South Korean automakers have had production lines in China for a long time, so import tariffs are not an issue, and the South Korean automotive industry worries that deregulation would bring Chinese vehicles into South Korea. As for car parts, that was an exchange to protect South Korea’s agricultural industry by restricting the import of Chinese agricultural products.
Taiwan’s machine tool industry lost 16 percent last year due to the rampant depreciation of the Japanese yen. While Chinese import tariffs on machine tools are about 9 percent, the Japanese yen has depreciated by 30 percent recently. The impact of this depreciation far exceeds the impact of the new FTA, but the ministry has failed to come up with a response.
As to the petroleum and steel industries, China, not South Korea, is the main threat.
In addition, the FTA will only take effect after being approved by the Chinese and South Korean parliaments, and after that, import tariffs will be removed in stages over five to 20 years. So the ministry’s estimate appears designed simply to frighten the public. We can only speculate if this is the result of ineptitude or because the ministry has ulterior motives.
It is true that the FTA will have a great impact on Taiwan, but it would be as wrong to exaggerate this fact as it would be to ignore it and do nothing. Taiwan should work hard to liberalize its economy, and it should sign a goods and services trade agreements with China, but not under the present conditions.
When estimating the benefits and negative impact on different industries, the government should be clear and concise, and it should provide complementary measures for guidance and assistance. Before any agreements are signed, any impact assessment and complementary measures should be explained in detail to the public. It must under no circumstances sign the agreements before providing information to the public, which requires more than glossing things over and saying that the benefits outweigh the shortcomings.
The government clearly has learned nothing from the appearance of the Sunflower movement and national outrage in response to the service trade agreement. It now wants to use the China-South Korea FTA to frighten the public and strike back at the opposition, but if it cannot even get the most basic information right, it will shoot itself in the foot.
Over the past few years, migrant workers’ rights have improved in Taiwan, but there has not been a comparable improvement in protections for employers, who are faced with a range of challenges, such as family nurses mistreating patients or workers threatening to change brokers or demanding that employers change their jobs. Then there is the decrease in work standards. Migrant workers too often find the lure of the underground jobs market irresistible, are unaware of employment laws and regulations, or have found that National Immigration Agency (NIA) checks are lax, and as a result abscond. If this happens, what protections or
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has been giving daily COVID-19 updates for almost four months, and on several occasions when major developments have arisen, the news conferences have attracted large numbers of viewers. The entire nation is anxious about the pandemic, and interest in the latest news has become a part of daily life. Watching the center’s daily news conferences has become something of a national ritual. The pandemic has stabilized within Taiwan due to the admirable efforts of each person living in the nation conducting themselves with the utmost responsibility, and in certain cases making considerable sacrifices within their
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II. In that war’s aftermath, novelist George Orwell produced two prophetic works. The first, Animal Farm, was published in August 1945; the second, Nineteen Eighty-Four, came out in June 1949. Both still ring true and cover a wide range of messages, including even how the mid-sized nation of Taiwan achieved its democracy and why it still maintains an outlier status in a COVID-19 world. With its full planetary scope, WWII left untold millions dead and injured, cities were destroyed and the future path of most nations was altered. New
United States Senator “Kit” Bond (R-MO) was a real leader on Asia policy during his time in Congress. Like most senators, he had a ready one-liner for every occasion. The one I never tired of hearing is “Well, looks like everything has been said. The problem is not everyone has said it.” It’s sort of like with US-China great power competition. There is not much new to say. This is especially true because it’s largely a story of what’s already happened: BRI, Made in China 2025, aggression in the South China Sea, provocations on the Indian border, cyber-hacks, erosion of “one country,