Food safety scandals have dealt a heavy blow to the food industry, but they have also taught the public a practical lesson: The government’s free economic pilot zones are not feasible.
However, the government wants the legislature to quickly pass an act on the oversight of cross-strait agreements as well as the proposed special free economic pilot zones act so that former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) would have a gift to take to the APEC summit in Beijing.
Are the free economic pilot zones really feasible? Would a government that cannot control even the most basic of oil products be able to control and manage a simplified customs procedure and processing outside these zones for thousands of agricultural products without creating economic security problems that are even more serious than the current food safety problems?
Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團) and Wei Chuan Foods Corp (味全食品工業) are privately owned Taiwanese companies and the nation has a system of strict customs checks in place. Despite this, there are irregularities everywhere, and Chinese companies operating in the free economic pilot zones, supported by the Beijing government, would bring anarchy and industrial chaos to Taiwan.
First, the “shop in front, factory in back” design allows companies operating in the zones to carry out most of their processing and production outside the zones so that imported products can circulate through the whole nation. After processing, 10 percent or less can be sold domestically, which complicates the follow up and auditing activities. Judging from the number and quality of current government officials, all talk about strict controls and management is nonsense. As the government insists on introducing the free economic pilot zones, despite them not being feasible, one can but wonder what the government’s goal is.
Article 42 in the proposed act allows the processing of the 830 products that are still under import ban both in and outside the free economic pilot zones. As long as the processing of imported Chinese agricultural products are allowed in the zones, it can be expected that cheap Chinese agricultural products would enter the domestic market. Any talk about all imported Chinese agricultural products having to be re-exported is also nonsense, and there would be a lot of “bogus” exports and fake declarations.
The vision of forging the nation into “The Island of Free Markets” is not only preposterous, it is dangerous. The level of economic freedom in Taiwan surpassed that of Japan and South Korea a long time ago, it only maintains some regulations vis-a-vis China — a nation that wants to annex Taiwan. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration insists that Taiwan shall be forged into a free-market paradise, placing no restrictions at all on China, with the goal of turning the Taiwan of tomorrow into the Hong Kong of today, politically speaking, and into an appendix to China, economically speaking.
Ma must stop dreaming about making the nation a “center” for this, that or the other. Unless Taiwan becomes a Chinese province or a link in China’s “economic unification war,” Beijing objects even to free trade agreements between Taiwan and Malaysia and Australia. Would they really let Taiwan become an offshore center for the Chinese yuan?
The nation must open its eyes and take a closer look at the free economic pilot zones. The overconfidence in these zones which has reached grotesque proportions is a cover for unspeakable ulterior motives.
Huang Tien-lin is former president and chairman of First Commercial Bank, and a former Presidential Office adviser.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a