For a long time now, politicians in Taiwan have had the rather unfortunate habit of donning weird and wonderful outfits when they take to the streets drumming up votes in election campaigns. Even when they are in the Legislative Yuan, they have taken to wearing sleeveless jackets with their names embroidered on them.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lifer, reared in its bosom from a young age, never seems to grow tired of treading the sidewalk suitably attired in his campaigning costume. Seeing him accompany the KMT’s Taipei mayoral candidate, princeling Sean Lien (連勝文), strutting his stuff, it is difficult to know whether to laugh or cry. Meanwhile, Prince Lien is trying to divest himself of his image of moneyed privilege, and has taken to slumming it in black T-shirt and jeans instead.
Ma seems to be having a bit of an identity crisis when he is out there on the streets campaigning for Prince Lien, dressed for battle in his sleeveless jacket embroidered with Lien’s name. He cannot get enough of the rapturous reception he gets on the campaign trail, which is so much nicer than having to deal with things like the tainted oil scandal when he is stuck in the office. He finds being out and about on the streets so much more amenable.
There, he can forget himself. When the two are out there, Ma just gets totally carried away, hogging the limelight and shoving Lien into the wings. Narcissism is a trait not easily suppressed for long. Have you ever seen the like? The supporting cast wearing the star attraction’s name, while the star himself cannot be bothered to put on the costume supplied for him. Not for this pair matching his-and-hers outfits. Perhaps there is substance to the rumor that the two men do not have all that much in common, despite their efforts to demonstrate otherwise.
Talk about the democratic circus. Roll up, roll up. It is all for show, it is all about dressing for the part. However, politicians in Taiwan do not know who they are supposed to be taking their cue from. Back in the day, it was all about the red sash draped over one shoulder when out electioneering, which has evolved over time into the now ubiquitous sleeveless jacket embroidered with their name and party affiliation. Even when dueling in the legislature, they put on their specially made costumes, displaying their name and party for all to see, like their own individual banners stating for which side they fight as they head into the fray.
In Western democracies, whether they follow a presidential system as in the US or a Cabinet system like in the UK, people in congress and parliament conduct themselves in a considered, mature fashion; elected representatives are professional and responsible, turning up appropriately suited and booted, neat and tidy. They do not denigrate themselves by wearing silly costumes emblazoned with their party name, or by scrapping in the national legislature.
When an army goes to war, uniforms and insignia are essential: They make it possible to distinguish which army a person is fighting for, so soldiers do not accidentally kill someone on their own side. It also enhances the feeling of camaraderie with those who are with you, and enmity for those who you are against. It is the same with sports teams. When they play against each other, the different kit makes the referee’s job easier, and also promotes team spirit among members of the same side. Come now: A nation’s congress is another proposition entirely. People there should behave in a civil and conscientious manner. Wearing these sleeveless jackets as battle dress only serves to promote conflict.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS