With their time in power ending in less than two years, the discourse propagated by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government is becoming increasingly focused on eventual unification with China.
Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission Minister Jaclyn Tsai (蔡玉玲), who at first welcomed a visit by the Dalai Lama to Taiwan, changed her tune after China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said that such a visit would only hurt cross-strait relations. She is now saying that if the Dalai Lama applies for a visa to Taiwan, she would consider the interests of the country and the general public in handling the application in a way that is agreeable to both host and guest.
This reaction is very similar to how Ma reacted to a different warning from the office: The president has kept quiet ever since the Taiwan Affairs Office responded after he voiced support for the pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong by saying he should stop making irresponsible remarks. Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Wu Mei-hung (吳美紅) went as far as to say: “We have never said we support the Occupy Central campaign.”
Astonishingly, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) has said that cross-strait relations have reached the stage where all doors are wide open and that any invitation to the Dalai Lama should be preceded by first contacting China over the matter.
He also said that based on the KMT’s view that there is “one China” — with each side having their own interpretation of what that “China” means — Taiwan is also part of China and since the Dalai Lama cannot visit China, a visit to Taiwan would be tantamount to him returning to China. It would seem that in the minds of the Ma camp’s legislators, there are certain matters that, should Taiwan want to carry them out, require that Taipei first contact Beijing and give assurances that it is not trying to stir up trouble, as well as make it clear that Taiwan is part of China.
If, as Wu suggests, the nation would really have to pay that price to invite the Dalai Lama for a visit, then would that not be the same thing as inviting the Tibetan leader just to show that Taiwan is part of China? That would also mean that Chinese officials visiting Taiwan are really only coming here to inspect the Chinese countryside.
It is worth noting that Wu’s statement caused a dispute, after which the council rushed endorse it and say that the “China” Wu was talking about was the Republic of China and that his view was in line with the constitutional system. It is obvious that Wu’s view reflects those held by Ma and his administration.
To say that the Republic of China is the same as China blithely ignores that the China recognized by most of the international community is the People’s Republic of China. Particularly questionable is that the Ma administration at first blacklisted the Dalai Lama, but now wants to use him to endorse Taiwan being a part of China. The Dalai Lama, however, would find that unbearable.
On Oct. 24, Ma reiterated his plan to continue talks on the cross-strait trade in goods agreement; implement the cross-strait service trade agreement and the act regulating the oversight of cross-strait negotiations; and that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait should sign an agreement to establish reciprocal liaison offices as soon as possible.
He stressed that the representative office proposal is intended mainly to provide liaison services, that it would have no political significance and that it would in no way attempt to emulate the foreign affairs framework because the cross-strait relationship, of course, is not an international one.
Continuously wasting breath on repeating that the cross-strait relationship is not international just to keep Beijing at ease is another expression of the same “local government” mindset that makes the Ma administration want to keep the Chinese government calm by saying that Taiwan is part of China. Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) is showing the same talent for playing the stooge when he acts as Beijing’s mouthpiece.
On Oct. 23, the KMT appealed the first and second verdicts handed down by the courts denying its attempt to kick Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) out of the party by filing yet another appeal in the Supreme Court, ignoring the many voices within the party calling for reconciliation and unity.
Ostensibly, the KMT leadership’s reason for appealing the verdict is that it wants to prevent the party’s disciplinary system from collapsing, but the real reason is that it wants to prevent the party chairman’s prestige and authority from being trampled.
This is of course because Ma — whose support ratings stand at just 9 percent — is forced to rely on the party-state framework and the party’s ability to lead the government to be able to eliminate dissidents, dominate public opinion and force KMT legislators to pass the cross-strait service trade agreement, the trade in goods agreement and the pact to exchange liaison offices. In doing so, he is locking Taiwan’s economy onto China’s to help Beijing gain a solid hold on Taiwan and realize the Chinese dream that the Chinese Communist Party and the KMT share — the dream in which Taiwan is part of China.
When Ma met with US professor Michael Porter, a leading authority on corporate strategy, on Oct. 24, he said that Taiwan’s competitiveness was ranked 18th on a list of 144 countries, but that Taiwanese salaries only ranked 60th in the world. Ma said this was both quite odd and worrying, and that the causes of this discrepancy had to be identified since it was having a negative impact on the nation’s competitiveness.
This was quite ironic, since the problem is Ma himself. It is his China-leaning policies that have caused workers’ salaries to move closer toward China’s low-salary standard, while all the benefits of cross-strait trade have been monopolized by Ma’s supporters across business and political circles.
If Ma continues to insist on only doing things his own way and ignoring all other opinions, salaries will continue to drop, as will Taiwan’s competitiveness. Ma, however, is not worried, because that would mean that he really will get his own page in the history books.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS