Vocational students neglected
Learning English can be fun, and learning it well can be easy. On a personal level, efficient learning strategies, continuous effort and constant practice help a student make great strides.
Successful English learners are everywhere, but why are young English learners of such interest to corporate institutions? As society becomes increasingly globalized, there seem to be more factors likely to influence the success of English education than people might think.
English learning has gone beyond a purely educational dimension, and evolved across managerial, social, economic and political dimensions as well. In assessing standards of learning, there are many contexts to consider when attempting to improve the education system.
I agree with Cheng Shiuh-tarng’s (鄭旭棠) analysis of some fundamental problems of English education, including the gap between class learning and real-life use of English (“Poor English reflects flawed system,” Oct. 24, page 8). Many Taiwanese students start to learn English in primary education, and should therefore possess reasonable English communication skills by adulthood.
However, when it comes to using English as a foreign language, it is difficult to think of many occasions where Taiwanese really need to use English. When people do need to speak English, some struggle due to a lack of confidence.
As the English learned at school seems to have little benefit in real-life situations, low-performing students might feel that learning English is irrelevant, and therefore lack the required motivation to learn.
Cheng said that the unfavorable conditions of private universities compare to those of public institutions, in terms of the educational resources allocated by the government, and this also has an impact on the motivation to learn English.
However, he failed to address the situation from the perspective of private technological and vocational universities students. Vocational higher education has never been the government’s top priority, and schools in this system have long been criticized by policymakers and teachers of EFL for having undesirable English learning standards. However, I do not think society and policymakers really understand the problems facing private technological university students and the needed support that is long overdue.
The low entry level of technological university students places them on an unequal footing and at a competitive disadvantage with their counterparts in conventional universities.
The limited number of required English classes and the students’ relatively lower socioeconomic background further reduces their confidence. More often than not, the impractical English curriculum lowers their motivation to learn, especially if it is not geared toward a real-life context, or beneficial to their potential employment.
Unfortunately, more words have been spoken about these problems than the actions that should have been taken to remedy the problems. Instead of paying lip service, the government and school management should show their resolve by making positive changes for the students concerned and invest more resources to improve their English ability and competitiveness in the job market.
Improvement of curricula to highlight core practical skills and inspire self-directed learning through effective mechanisms and efficient management of English education could have a substantial impact given strong and lasting support from those in charge.
The key to a better future of English education is not simply to identify problems, but to seeking feasible solutions.
Everyone can help themselves by finding successful English learners and adopting their effective habits to aid continual improvement.
Learning English is a lifelong process. Instead of preaching to students about the importance of learning English, people should show them how to treasure learning English by using themselves as examples. Making it a habit to improve one’s English is a worthwhile goal and a good lesson for younger generations.
Huang Da-fu
Greater Tainan
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS