Although governmental authorities insist that their recent actions toward independent Taipei mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — including inspecting his tax records and saying it is inappropriate and illegal for Ko’s wife to take part in campaign events — are completely legal and in “accordance with the law,” it is hard for people to not see such moves as being politically motivated.
Following the failure of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien’s (連勝文) purported campaign to discredit Ko by questioning his use of National Taiwan University Hospital bank accounts last month, the National Taxation Bureau of Taipei launched an inspection of Ko’s tax records.
Although the tax authority defended the move as a “routine inspection” resulting from anonymous tips it received about fees Ko was paid for giving speeches, the probe still drew much criticism from the public, with many panning it as politically motivated.
Yet it seemed the KMT government still had not learned its lesson. Over the weekend, Ko’s wife, Chen Pei-chi (陳佩琪), took part in a campaign event while her husband was away in the US. Afterwards, the Taipei City Government immediately said that Chen was in violation of the Public Servant Administrative Neutrality Act (公務人員行政中立法), which prohibits government employees campaigning publicly for a candidate, saying that since Chen is a doctor at a public hospital, she is technically a government employee.
The latest attack renewed public criticism, with many again condemning it as a political tactic.
To quell the rising criticism, Taipei Mayoral Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) yesterday said that, considering that Chen is Ko’s wife, the city government should not be so strict in passing judgement in this case.
Although all the authorities that launched probes or made accusations against Ko have defended their actions as them following the law, it is difficult not to think that politics are the true motivation.
Certainly, the Pubic Servant Administrative Neutrality Act prohibits government workers from taking part in election events, but it does allow the spouse or immediate family members of a candidate to attend campaign events, though they are banned from “advertising” or “endorsing” a candidate.
So what does constitute “advertising” or “endorsing” a candidate? Did it count as advertising or endorsing when Chen appeared in a crowded market, escorted by Ko’s campaign staff and a city councilor candidate? Is it advertisement or endorsement when Chen says: “Please support my husband”?
The legal aspect of this issue may be complicated and the central or local election authorities usually decide if anyone is in violation of administrative neutrality or the Election and Recall Act for Public Servants (公職人員選舉罷免法). Hence, while the city government accused Chen of acting inappropriately and illegally, it is the one acting inappropriately and illegally, as officials have no right to declare Chen’s actions illegal before the case has been carefully examined and discussed.
In each election, there are dozens of violations of electoral laws, but these are always announced after central or local election commissions conduct case-by-case examinations, which nearly always take place after elections.
Investigations into other matters — such as tax evasion — too, are usually conducted quietly and their results announced only until after the election, unless the evidence is air-tight. It is therefore highly reasonable to suspect that the latest accusation made by the Taipei City Government, the tax evasion investigation and the hospital account claims were all meant to project a negative image of Ko to voters.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence